Zibb
Subscribe to Control Engineering
FirstLight
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Resistance Temperature Detectors

Whether in two-, three-, or four-wire configuration, RTDs have proven to be stable and accurate temperature measurement devices. They are also the most expensive. Understanding the pros and cons of RTDs can facilitate your temperature measurement device decisions.

By Dale Cigoy -- Control Engineering, 11/1/2005

AT A GLANCE
  • Current source issues
  • Low resistance
  • Self-heating
  • Error elimination

Of the many ways to measure temperature, one of the most accurate is a resistance temperature detector, usually referred to as an RTD. In an RTD, the resistance of the device is proportional to temperature. The most common resistive material for RTDs is platinum, though some RTDs are made from nickel or copper. RTDs have a wide range of temperatures. Depending on their construction, they can measure temperatures in the range of -270 to 850 °C.

RTDs require an external stimulus, usually a current source, to function properly. However, current generates heat in the resistive element, which causes an error in the temperature measurement. The measurement error is calculated by the formula:

ÄT = P x S

where T is temperature, P is the I2R power generated, and S is °C/milliwatt.

Measurement methods

There are several techniques for measuring temperature with an RTD. The first is a two-wire method that works by forcing current through the RTD and measuring the resulting voltage. The benefit is that it's a simple method using only two wires, making it easy to connect and implement. The main drawback is that the lead resistance is part of the measurement, which can cause some error.

Instrumentation
Schematic shows the setup for a typical two-wire resistance measurement.

An improvement on the two-wire method is the three-wire method. Here again, a current is forced through the device and a resulting voltage is measured. However, using a third wire provides compensation for the lead resistance. This requires either a three-wire compensating measurement unit or actually measuring the contribution from the third wire and subtracting it from the overall measurement.

A third technique is the four-wire method. Like in the other two methods, a current is forced through and a voltage measured. However, the current is sourced on one set of leads while the voltage is sensed on another set of leads. The voltage is sensed at the resistive element (RTD), not at the same point as the source current. This means the test lead resistance is completely out of the measurement path. In other words, the test lead resistance is not a part of the measurement.

For example, if the test lead resistance is about 100 milliohms and the RTD is a 100-Ohm RTD, then the test lead resistance will be about 0.1% of error. In the four-wire method, the test lead resistance is not part of the measurement. Therefore, it is a much more accurate technique for measuring the resistance of the RTD, because it completely eliminates lead resistance.

Pros and cons

RTDs have some distinct advantages over other temperature-measuring devices. For one, they are the most stable and most accurate of all the different temperature measurement devices. They also are more linear than thermocouples.

Instrumentation
A typical four-wire resistance measurement setup helps eliminate much of the noise and uncertainty in temperature measurements.

There are a few drawbacks, however. RTDs are more expensive than thermistors and thermocouples. Also, they require a current source. They have a small delta R, which means there is a low resistance to temperature change. For example, to change one degree C, the RTD might change by 0.1 Ohm. However, low absolute resistance could lead to measurement errors if using the two-wire method.

When using RTDs, several common occurrences are often not accounted for, the biggest of which is self-heating. If the RTD self heats with the test current, measurement inaccuracy could result. If measuring low temperature (for example, below 0 °C), the heat from the RTD could raise the expected temperature. Also, if there is no compensation for the test leads, even more error can be introduced into the measurement. Using a four-wire method helps eliminate this type of error. Another mistake is not selecting the proper RTD temperature range. Trying to measure outside of the RTD temperature range can result in more errors or even sensor damage. Always select the appropriate RTD for the expected measurement.


Author Information
Dale Cigoy is senior applications engineer, Keithley Instruments Inc.; www.keithley.com
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author

There are no other articles written by this author.

Sponsored Links

 

Advertisement
SPONSORED LINKS

More Content

  • Blogs
  • Discussions
  • Webcasts
  • Podcasts
  • Videos

Blogs

  • Charlie Masi
    Ask Charlie

    December 1, 2008
    Why should we spend billions of dollars on high-energy physics research?
    This question came in as a (rather irate sounding) Talkback item for a recently published article in a Control Engineering print issue. It rea......
    More
  • David Chappell
    Standard profits: Make2Pack and ISA88

    November 23, 2008
    Make2Pack in Europe, working prototype automation object, 2 meetings
    With all the effort to push the update of ISA88 Part 1 to a close Part 5 is receiving less attention and effort. But after the first of the year I ......
    More
  • View All BlogsRSS

Discussions

  • Re: Modbus Slave Simulator (reply posted by Mark)

  • Magelis XBTGT with Zelio Smart Relay via MODBUS (posted by N1K0)

  • P & I Autocad symbols (posted by Takudzwa)


  • Source: Control.com, the global online discussion community for automation professionals.

    Webcasts

    Engineering-driven Ethernet
    This Control Engineering Roundtable Webcast will address the engineering issues you should be aware of when exploring the adoption of Ethernet or when looking to expand its use in your facility.

    Bridging gaps with wireless
    Discover how you can create stronger, flexible and cost-effective wireless connections for your entire plant. Register today!

    View All Webcasts
    Advertisements





    NEWSLETTERS

    Get engineering industry news, trends, and business-critical information delivered directly to your inbox!

    Click on a title below to learn more.

    Weekly News (Weekly)
    Process Instrumentation & Sensors (Monthly)
    System Integration Monthly (Monthly)
    Process & Advanced Control (Monthly)
    Machine Control (Monthly)
    Information Control (Monthly)
    Automation Control (Monthly)
    Product Review (Monthly)
    Simplified Safety
    Fieldbus Facts
    PROFInews North American Edition
    About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Useful Sites   |   FREE Subscription   |   RSS
    © 2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
    Please visit these other Reed Business sites