Recent Posts
- PBS teaching young children science
- Putting termites to work
- Who's searching on "engineer?"
- Back to ExxonMobil and the skills gap
- Blackout plus five: Any improvements?
- Driving is down, biking is up
- Corn for ethanol sets record in 2008
- ExxonMobil helping plug skills gap
- EPA: Ethanol to stay
- Why drill for oil domestically?
Recent Comments
- Nancy McIntyre on ExxonMobil helping plug skills gap
- EPA: Ethanol to stay on EPA: Ethanol to stay
- MWegenka on Reducing energy use, the hard way
- Kirslis on Making gasoline out of coal
- John Rezabek on 3.6 billion gallons per day
Most Commented On
- Chinese pharma plants go un-inspected? (2)
- I am not a socialist (2)
- EPA: Ethanol to stay (1)
- ExxonMobil helping plug skills gap (1)
- Reducing energy use, the hard way (1)
Archives
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
Blog
Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (0)
Let's not go into a cyber panic
The video showing the exploding generator has been making the rounds. If you don't know the story, you can see it online.
Apparently this was an experiment done by people at Idaho National Labs strictly as an internal exercise and it was not intended for prime time. This was supposed to illustrate what a hacker can do by invading a particular type of control system through a vulnerability they discovered.
I'm not sure what to believe about the technical issues, because the AP story describes it as a turbine, but it looks a lot more to us like a Diesel generator. If you watch the long version of the video, (click here and scroll down to see the video box) the skid jumps a couple times and white smoke begins to pour out. We can't tell if the hacker did something to the engine or the generator. White smoke pours out of what looks like the crankshaft seal and black smoke out of the exhaust. A blown valve? We'll have to see if INL decides to explain more of the details.
The result of this could ultimately be good if it increases awareness of the need for cyber security. The result could also be bad if it prompts a knee-jerk reaction that causes lawmakers to do something stupid just to give the indication that they're doing something.
If you sit quietly, you can hear the sound of hands wringing. Let's hope we haven't given hackers who were getting bored trying to steal credit card numbers a new idea of something to strive for.
Let's not go into a cyber panic
September 28, 2007
The video showing the exploding generator has been making the rounds. If you don't know the story, you can see it online.Apparently this was an experiment done by people at Idaho National Labs strictly as an internal exercise and it was not intended for prime time. This was supposed to illustrate what a hacker can do by invading a particular type of control system through a vulnerability they discovered.
I'm not sure what to believe about the technical issues, because the AP story describes it as a turbine, but it looks a lot more to us like a Diesel generator. If you watch the long version of the video, (click here and scroll down to see the video box) the skid jumps a couple times and white smoke begins to pour out. We can't tell if the hacker did something to the engine or the generator. White smoke pours out of what looks like the crankshaft seal and black smoke out of the exhaust. A blown valve? We'll have to see if INL decides to explain more of the details.
The result of this could ultimately be good if it increases awareness of the need for cyber security. The result could also be bad if it prompts a knee-jerk reaction that causes lawmakers to do something stupid just to give the indication that they're doing something.
If you sit quietly, you can hear the sound of hands wringing. Let's hope we haven't given hackers who were getting bored trying to steal credit card numbers a new idea of something to strive for.
Posted by Peter Welander on September 28, 2007 | Comments (0)
Advertisement
Advertisements



