Recent Posts
- Clean coal in eastern Germany
- Emerson: Watching the ceremony
- Your own home fuel cell plant
- Death of the typewriter (man)
- Living: How green is green enough?
- ISA Expo: Show must go on
- Re-branding a legacy
- Back to the "smart grid"
- Learning to live with change
- Back to $100 oil?
Recent Comments
- Bryan St.Martin on Clean coal in eastern Germany
- Sandor Fule, Hungary on I am not a socialist
- Sandor Fule, Hungary on Economics of not driving to work
- Nico on Making gasoline out of coal
- Mark Hoske, Control Engineering on Learning to live with change
Most Commented On
- I am not a socialist (3)
- Chinese pharma plants go un-inspected? (2)
- Making gasoline out of coal (2)
- Clean coal in eastern Germany (1)
- Economics of not driving to work (1)
Archives
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
Blog
Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (0)
England's energy future
Two recent articles discuss England's energy future:
A short squib in the Chicago Tribune this morning says that the government has approved construction of the first new nuclear power plants in a generation. Like others, England is looking again at this technology as practical and environmentally friendly, in its own way. Of course some environmentalists disagree.
Seeing that article reminds me of the story in the December issue of Control Engineering about the natural gas fields off the coast of Norway now being used to heat homes in England, after pumping gas through a 1,200 km pipeline. One offshore field is expected to provide 20% of England's gas consumption for 40 years.
That pipeline sounds like a big deal in the sense of "look how far they have to go for energy sources," but in the greater scheme of things, it's really a pretty convenient option compared to bringing in tanker loads from many thousands of miles away. In the U.S. we get much our energy in ways that are just as complicated if not more so.
The nuclear energy approach makes a lot of sense given fuel availability and carbon footprint/greenhouse gas issues. It will be interesting to see how nuke plant construction could be updated once we move out of 1950's and '60's technology. These "first in a generation" plants in Europe and the U.S. will need a new generation of control technology, and it's ready to go.
England's energy future
January 11, 2008
Two recent articles discuss England's energy future:A short squib in the Chicago Tribune this morning says that the government has approved construction of the first new nuclear power plants in a generation. Like others, England is looking again at this technology as practical and environmentally friendly, in its own way. Of course some environmentalists disagree.
Seeing that article reminds me of the story in the December issue of Control Engineering about the natural gas fields off the coast of Norway now being used to heat homes in England, after pumping gas through a 1,200 km pipeline. One offshore field is expected to provide 20% of England's gas consumption for 40 years.
That pipeline sounds like a big deal in the sense of "look how far they have to go for energy sources," but in the greater scheme of things, it's really a pretty convenient option compared to bringing in tanker loads from many thousands of miles away. In the U.S. we get much our energy in ways that are just as complicated if not more so.
The nuclear energy approach makes a lot of sense given fuel availability and carbon footprint/greenhouse gas issues. It will be interesting to see how nuke plant construction could be updated once we move out of 1950's and '60's technology. These "first in a generation" plants in Europe and the U.S. will need a new generation of control technology, and it's ready to go.
Posted by Peter Welander on January 11, 2008 | Comments (0)
Advertisement
Advertisements



