Recent Posts
- Emerson: Watching the ceremony
- Your own home fuel cell plant
- Death of the typewriter (man)
- Living: How green is green enough?
- ISA Expo: Show must go on
- Re-branding a legacy
- Back to the "smart grid"
- Learning to live with change
- Back to $100 oil?
- Economics of not driving to work
Recent Comments
- Sandor Fule, Hungary on I am not a socialist
- Sandor Fule, Hungary on Economics of not driving to work
- Nico on Making gasoline out of coal
- Mark Hoske, Control Engineering on Learning to live with change
- Nancy McIntyre on ExxonMobil helping plug skills gap
Most Commented On
- I am not a socialist (3)
- Chinese pharma plants go un-inspected? (2)
- Making gasoline out of coal (2)
- Economics of not driving to work (1)
- Learning to live with change (1)
Archives
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
Blog
Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (0)
Who makes final environmental decisions?
Returning again to the BP Whiting saga, there is now a flap over how much soot the plant can currently and will be able to release. A bit of soot here or there isn't the issue, but it's how the decision is being made.
According to the Chicago Tribune, Indiana regulators granted the exemption to BP to allow the soot release. However, the state may not have the final word. Federal EPA authorities are looking at the situation and may put a stop to it. Moreover, Illinois lawmakers are seeing if they can sue to have it all stopped.
There will not be an answer on this anytime soon. It will be tied up in the courts for quite a while if history is any indicator. BP will be left with unclear answers as to what it has to do under the circumstances. And let's not forget the court of public opinion. As the article also says, BP has backed off its plans to release more sludge and ammonia into Lake Michigan due to "a groundswell of protest from politicians and the public."
This situation has certainly provided lessons for any process manufacturer. The most important one is to keep a low profile. If that doesn't work, you may never know when you have finally arrived at the point where you can operate without challenge. Read the full article. This story will likely become a case study for large process producers in the future.
Who makes final environmental decisions?
August 29, 2007
Returning again to the BP Whiting saga, there is now a flap over how much soot the plant can currently and will be able to release. A bit of soot here or there isn't the issue, but it's how the decision is being made.According to the Chicago Tribune, Indiana regulators granted the exemption to BP to allow the soot release. However, the state may not have the final word. Federal EPA authorities are looking at the situation and may put a stop to it. Moreover, Illinois lawmakers are seeing if they can sue to have it all stopped.
There will not be an answer on this anytime soon. It will be tied up in the courts for quite a while if history is any indicator. BP will be left with unclear answers as to what it has to do under the circumstances. And let's not forget the court of public opinion. As the article also says, BP has backed off its plans to release more sludge and ammonia into Lake Michigan due to "a groundswell of protest from politicians and the public."
This situation has certainly provided lessons for any process manufacturer. The most important one is to keep a low profile. If that doesn't work, you may never know when you have finally arrived at the point where you can operate without challenge. Read the full article. This story will likely become a case study for large process producers in the future.
Posted by Peter Welander on August 29, 2007 | Comments (0)
Advertisement
Advertisements



