Recent Posts
- 3.6 billion gallons per day
- China's new slogan
- India's lessons of high energy costs
- Risks of wireless pioneering
- Has oil peaked?
- Fighting global warming like sheep
- Go to a virtual trade show & conference
- Happy World Environment Day!
- Airlines struggle with fuel cost too
- GM acknowledges painful reality
Recent Comments
- Patrick Rafter on Go to a virtual trade show & conference
- Bubba210 on Where your gas money goes
- Mark on GM acknowledges painful reality
- Qukler on I am not a socialist
- rich merritt on I am not a socialist
Most Commented On
- Chinese pharma plants go un-inspected? (2)
- I am not a socialist (2)
- GM acknowledges painful reality (1)
- Go to a virtual trade show & conference (1)
- Where your gas money goes (1)
Archives
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
Blog
Thoughts from MCAA, part 4
May 25, 2007
Yesterday I started the discussion of what a company does after it buys somebody else. Leopold Streit from Siemens said that they had various choices of what to do with Controlotron products once they moved into Siemens' portfolio:
1. Maintain the original branding, i.e., "Controlotron, a Siemens company" which would use the same name, trademarks, etc., as the original in order to maintain market recognition and continuity. 2. Lose the original branding and make it Siemens from the start. Re-brand the product and renumber it according to Siemens standards. This is more typically the approach when the buyer is better known, and what Siemens did in this case.(There are some variations that fall between these two, but usually companies follow one or the other.)If you Google "Controlotron," you will find references to their old Website, (www.controlotron.com) but if you go there it takes you to Siemens. In this particular case, Controlotron did not have additional products that duplicated Siemens offerings. However sometimes the acquiring company ends up with more than it can use. Often those "orphaned" products are sold off or simply killed to avoid needless duplications. Streit did note that Siemens kept some of Controlotron's product numbering scheme for the sake of long time users, but adapted it to Siemens larger product designation strategy. In this case, Controlotron offered a product family that complimented Siemens' offering but was not a direct competitor. Buying a competitor is a different matter, as Streit observed. He said that Siemens' purchase of Moore Products was more complicated, and admittedly not as successful, but he didn't go into more detail. That discussion might be an interesting one to pursue someday.
If you're an end user, you will be left to deal with whatever course the purchaser chooses. If the products you need are things that you don't buy often and you lose track of the old company, you might make another choice entirely. That's the real risk. It's critical for the company that makes the acquisition to maintain all the paths to the old company for many years after the merger. But, usually once it happens and critical customers are fully up to date on what's happened, things do work out and life goes on. Hopefully you aren't depending on the availability of one of those orphaned products.
Posted by Peter Welander on May 25, 2007 | Comments (0)



