Recent Posts
- 3.6 billion gallons per day
- China's new slogan
- India's lessons of high energy costs
- Risks of wireless pioneering
- Has oil peaked?
- Fighting global warming like sheep
- Go to a virtual trade show & conference
- Happy World Environment Day!
- Airlines struggle with fuel cost too
- GM acknowledges painful reality
Recent Comments
- Patrick Rafter on Go to a virtual trade show & conference
- Bubba210 on Where your gas money goes
- Mark on GM acknowledges painful reality
- Qukler on I am not a socialist
- rich merritt on I am not a socialist
Most Commented On
- Chinese pharma plants go un-inspected? (2)
- I am not a socialist (2)
- GM acknowledges painful reality (1)
- Go to a virtual trade show & conference (1)
- Where your gas money goes (1)
Archives
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
Blog
Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (0)
Getting in line on wind power
Two recent stories in the Chicago Tribune on wind power generation caught my eye recently. The first says that a recent study by the Department of Energy and the energy industry suggests that if wind power developments continue as expected, it could provide 20% of our electricity by 2030. When you consider that is the amount of power currently produced by nuclear plants, it is nothing to sneeze at. That's a pretty big jump since wind generates about 1% today, but the combined output grew by 45% last year.
The second story is about famous oilman T. Boone Pickens and his plan to build a huge wind farm near Pampa, TX. That state is already the leading wind power producer in the U.S. and has three of our five largest wind farms. (Read the article Wind Power's Growing Contribution from Control Engineering, October, 2007.) While Texas may be known for other forms of energy, it is nice to know that they are looking well down the road. Pickens points out that wind power depends on federal tax credits to survive. The idea that congress would allow such credits to expire at this point seems pretty silly. You'd think that they would be doing everything possible to ensure the future of any technology that doesn't depend on fossil fuels and carbon. I guess we'll see.
Getting in line on wind power
May 15, 2008
Two recent stories in the Chicago Tribune on wind power generation caught my eye recently. The first says that a recent study by the Department of Energy and the energy industry suggests that if wind power developments continue as expected, it could provide 20% of our electricity by 2030. When you consider that is the amount of power currently produced by nuclear plants, it is nothing to sneeze at. That's a pretty big jump since wind generates about 1% today, but the combined output grew by 45% last year.The second story is about famous oilman T. Boone Pickens and his plan to build a huge wind farm near Pampa, TX. That state is already the leading wind power producer in the U.S. and has three of our five largest wind farms. (Read the article Wind Power's Growing Contribution from Control Engineering, October, 2007.) While Texas may be known for other forms of energy, it is nice to know that they are looking well down the road. Pickens points out that wind power depends on federal tax credits to survive. The idea that congress would allow such credits to expire at this point seems pretty silly. You'd think that they would be doing everything possible to ensure the future of any technology that doesn't depend on fossil fuels and carbon. I guess we'll see.
Posted by Peter Welander on May 15, 2008 | Comments (0)
Advertisement
Advertisements



