Recent Posts
- Who's searching on "engineer?"
- Back to ExxonMobil and the skills gap
- Blackout plus five: Any improvements?
- Driving is down, biking is up
- Corn for ethanol sets record in 2008
- ExxonMobil helping plug skills gap
- EPA: Ethanol to stay
- Why drill for oil domestically?
- Reducing energy use, the hard way
- Gasoline stabilizes, now what?
Recent Comments
- Nancy McIntyre on ExxonMobil helping plug skills gap
- EPA: Ethanol to stay on EPA: Ethanol to stay
- MWegenka on Reducing energy use, the hard way
- Kirslis on Making gasoline out of coal
- John Rezabek on 3.6 billion gallons per day
Most Commented On
- Chinese pharma plants go un-inspected? (2)
- I am not a socialist (2)
- EPA: Ethanol to stay (1)
- ExxonMobil helping plug skills gap (1)
- Reducing energy use, the hard way (1)
Archives
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
Blog
Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (1)
Back to Lake Michigan
The headline in this morning's Chicago Tribune was "Big polluter to cut mercury." My first thought was that this was a new story about the BP Whiting Refinery since some cynics were calling BP "big polluter."
You may recall in the posting of July 30, there was discussion of BP's ability to release 2 pounds of mercury per year. However the story today is about a chlorine plant in Wisconsin, specifically the ERCO plant in Port Edwards in the middle of the state. This is one of the last five chlorine plants in the U.S. that uses a chlor-alkali process and mercury to turn brine into chlorine. Federal records show that this plant released 1,118 pounds of mercury in 2005. That makes it the 15th largest mercury polluter in the country and certainly the largest in Wisconsin. ERCO is going to close this process and convert to one that does not use mercury.
That's a good thing, but the question becomes, what happens to the 200 tons of the silvery liquid on hand at the plant? Mercury is a commodity, not a hazardous waste, according to the EPA. ERCO can simply sell it, and that seems to be what they have in mind.
There is an organization called Oceana which has bought old mercury to hold it someplace safe to keep it from going on the world market. They have been working on getting ERCO to change its process for a while now.
In any case, a few groups are watching this process, hoping the toxic metal doesn't simply turn up someplace else. As Eric Uram, the founder of Mercury Free Wisconsin said, "...the fear is this mercury could come back to haunt us."
Back to Lake Michigan
August 13, 2007
The headline in this morning's Chicago Tribune was "Big polluter to cut mercury." My first thought was that this was a new story about the BP Whiting Refinery since some cynics were calling BP "big polluter."You may recall in the posting of July 30, there was discussion of BP's ability to release 2 pounds of mercury per year. However the story today is about a chlorine plant in Wisconsin, specifically the ERCO plant in Port Edwards in the middle of the state. This is one of the last five chlorine plants in the U.S. that uses a chlor-alkali process and mercury to turn brine into chlorine. Federal records show that this plant released 1,118 pounds of mercury in 2005. That makes it the 15th largest mercury polluter in the country and certainly the largest in Wisconsin. ERCO is going to close this process and convert to one that does not use mercury.
That's a good thing, but the question becomes, what happens to the 200 tons of the silvery liquid on hand at the plant? Mercury is a commodity, not a hazardous waste, according to the EPA. ERCO can simply sell it, and that seems to be what they have in mind.
There is an organization called Oceana which has bought old mercury to hold it someplace safe to keep it from going on the world market. They have been working on getting ERCO to change its process for a while now.
In any case, a few groups are watching this process, hoping the toxic metal doesn't simply turn up someplace else. As Eric Uram, the founder of Mercury Free Wisconsin said, "...the fear is this mercury could come back to haunt us."
Posted by Peter Welander on August 13, 2007 | Comments (1)
August 14, 2007
In response to: Back to Lake Michigan
Jackie Savitz, Oceana commented:
In response to: Back to Lake Michigan
Jackie Savitz, Oceana commented:
Peter, Thank you for writing this article on such an important subject. I wanted to clarify one point. While it is true that Oceana has been working for two and half years, to get Erco to make this switch, we are not in the business of buying mercury, and we've never purchased any of it. We advocate for safe permanent storage of mercury, and for the export ban that is currently being considered in Congress. More about who we are and what we do on mercury click For anyone interested, our mercury page is www.oceana.org/mercury.
Advertisement
Advertisements



