Recent Posts
- Clean coal in eastern Germany
- Emerson: Watching the ceremony
- Your own home fuel cell plant
- Death of the typewriter (man)
- Living: How green is green enough?
- ISA Expo: Show must go on
- Re-branding a legacy
- Back to the "smart grid"
- Learning to live with change
- Back to $100 oil?
Recent Comments
- Bryan St.Martin on Clean coal in eastern Germany
- Sandor Fule, Hungary on I am not a socialist
- Sandor Fule, Hungary on Economics of not driving to work
- Nico on Making gasoline out of coal
- Mark Hoske, Control Engineering on Learning to live with change
Most Commented On
- I am not a socialist (3)
- Chinese pharma plants go un-inspected? (2)
- Making gasoline out of coal (2)
- Clean coal in eastern Germany (1)
- Economics of not driving to work (1)
Archives
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
Blog
Changing the value of a process variable
July 9, 2007
Our August issue will have a special supplement on wireless applications, including process plants. As I have been writing a large scale article for this, I have been considering larger aspects of instrumentation applications.
Let us not forget, wireless is nothing but a communication technology. It doesn't determine what we communicate. (Actually it does in many respects, but that's another discussion.) The same things that apply to hard wiring and fieldbus networking also apply to wireless. Those things are the cost vs. the value of adding another piece of instrumentation to obtain another process measurement.
Instrumentation providers would have you believe that the more data you can collect, the better you can understand and optimize your processes. How much will having one more pressure sensor tell you? What is the value of that reading when measured against the cost of getting it?
One extreme end of the cost range would be to put a mechanical gage at the top of a tower where it is 100+ steps above ground level and you have to send an operator up every five minutes to read it. That would be very expensive, and you would have to REALLY WANT that bit of data to justify it.
Replacing that mechanical gage with a sensor and running a 4-20 mA cable back or attaching it to a fieldbus network would be far less expensive, although if you had to add all the wiring could get pricey.
Wireless providers say, correctly most of the time, that they can make it even cheaper by eliminating the cost of the wiring. They are trying to say that when the cost of gathering data goes down, less valuable data becomes more interesting. If that one more pressure reading can generate $20 per day in higher production or reduced costs, you might consider spending $1000 to get it. How about $10 per day?
The point is, lower cost instrumentation and lower cost communication makes lower value measurements more attractive. But there will ultimately be a cut-off point. The interesting thing will be to determine where that point is. Assigning values will be the tricky part and bring out real creativity among engineers.
Posted by Peter Welander on July 9, 2007 | Comments (0)



