Recent Posts
- 3.6 billion gallons per day
- China's new slogan
- India's lessons of high energy costs
- Risks of wireless pioneering
- Has oil peaked?
- Fighting global warming like sheep
- Go to a virtual trade show & conference
- Happy World Environment Day!
- Airlines struggle with fuel cost too
- GM acknowledges painful reality
Recent Comments
- Patrick Rafter on Go to a virtual trade show & conference
- Bubba210 on Where your gas money goes
- Mark on GM acknowledges painful reality
- Qukler on I am not a socialist
- rich merritt on I am not a socialist
Most Commented On
- Chinese pharma plants go un-inspected? (2)
- I am not a socialist (2)
- GM acknowledges painful reality (1)
- Go to a virtual trade show & conference (1)
- Where your gas money goes (1)
Archives
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
Blog
Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (0)
Automotive process model for emissions control?
Automotive process model for emissions control?
April 10, 2007
Last Sunday, the Chicago Tribune had a front page story with the headline "State gives old beaters a free ride; new emissions policy means dirtier air for Illinois." The upshot of the article (once you get past all the official corruption issues, complaints about air quality, etc.) is that the auto emissions monitoring rules in Illinois are going to be changed to eliminate actual tailpipe sniffing in favor of checking the onboard computer that has been installed in every car since 1996. All the test procedure needs will be information from the computer to pass or flunk the car. (Pre-computer cars won't be tested at all. Yikes!)
I called Doug, my mechanic, and asked him what the car's computer is reporting. He said the testers are looking for stored trouble codes, which indicate when the engine has experienced problems that could affect emissions. They're the same kind of things that make your CHECK ENGINE light go on. "If there are no stored trouble codes, then you pass," he says. "It's like if you don't see blood squirting out of a person, you know he doesn't have a puncture wound."In other words, the state assumes that a properly working engine is not putting out excessive amounts of pollution. There has to be an exception to indicate a problem. They are, effectively, using a process model of an operating engine to predict emissions. If you know what is going into the process, you'll know what is coming out.This same kind of thing has been going on for a while now in some industrial applications. Customers in specific industries are allowed to monitor their emissions via a process model rather than actual measurement. I know of at least one company, Pavilion, who has products for this purpose, and the EPA has allowed their use in a few key industries. We are likely to see more of this, both in automotive circles and industrial applications. It increases the importance of effective instrumentation design and placement, along with more sophisticated process models. All are things that are of growing consequence to our industrial community, and we should be doing our best to advance these technologies.Posted by Peter Welander on April 10, 2007 | Comments (0)
Advertisement
Advertisements



