An ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis, operating efficiencies and cost savings, as well as all relevant safety standards, such as those from NFPA, ANSI, RIA, IEC, ISO and OSHA. About J.B. Titus.
Machine safety: Executives balance risks, profits
Industrial executives are engaged more than ever in operational risk oversight. This certainly includes machine safety.
Given our current economic environment, and particularly in industry, it’s probably not a big surprise that executives are engaged more than ever in operational risk oversight. Quickly reacting to shifts in market demands, adverse events and the ever changing governmental regulatory and compliance requirements is a must. Is machine safety in their cross hairs?
You bet! I recently read a recent study completed by the Aberdeen Group titled: Operational Risk Management: Getting Ahead of the Risk Curve, November 2012. In this study Aberdeen evaluated 119 executives from various companies and found that “best in class” companies established a framework to facilitate sustainable programs throughout the organization to identify risks, implement corrective procedures and preventive procedures.
So, how does this impact machine safety? Well, it seems that of the four major pressures driving their focus, there were eight influences impacting those financial risks. And, that there was no one single influence that was the most dominant. These eight influences are:
- Failure of Critical Assets
- Non-Compliance (OSHA, FDA, NERC, etc.)
- Environmental Impact (spills, leaks, etc.)
- Financial Risks
- Logistics Risks
- Supplier Quality
- Environmental Health and Safety (EH&S)
- Supplier Risks (re-evaluate portfolio of contract suppliers)
As an industry expert in machine safety I know that the above influences highlighted in yellow are heavily impacted by how effective a companies’ safety culture is within the business. For example, unplanned machine downtime and OEE (Overall Equipment Effectiveness) are two factors of effective machine safety and they directly contribute to “Failure of Critical Assets.” Both “Non-Compliance” to regulations and standards and “Environmental Impacts” of spills or leaks are major expenses of in-effective machine safety which go directly to the bottom line. And, “EH&S” issues in employee morale translate directly to productivity performance which also impacts the bottom line.
In my opinion, no wonder executives are balancing for profits focused at Operational Risk Management including machine safety.
Has this presented you with any new perspectives? Add your comments or thoughts to the discussion by submitting your ideas, experiences, and challenges in the comments section below.
Contact: http://www.jbtitus.com for “Solutions for Machine Safety”.
For more than 30 years, J.B. Titus has advised a wide range of clients on machine functional safety solutions, including Johnson + Johnson, Siemens, General Motors, Disney, Rockwell Automation, Bridgestone Firestone, and Samsung Heavy Industries. He holds a Bachelor of Business Administration degree from Oklahoma University in industrial management and an MBA from Case Western Reserve University in marketing and finance. He is a professional member of the American Society of Safety Engineers and is OSHA-certified in machine guarding. Titus is also TUV-certified as a Functional Safety Expert and serves on several American National Standards Institute, National Fire Protection Association, and National Electrical Manufacturers Association national safety and health standards committees. Reach him at jb(at)jbtitus.com and via www.jbtitus.com.