Machine Guarding: Tolerable vs residual risk

Why do so many colleagues in manufacturing choose to avoid the terms – tolerable risk and residual risk? If there’s one thing “integrated safety systems” and requirements for risk assessments have brought to the industrial forefront over the past ten years – it’s risk awareness. It’s now “OK” in conversation and correspondence within companies to use words like; risk, safety, mitigation, hazard, and consequences – all in one paragraph.

11/11/2011


JB Titus, CFSEWhy do so many colleagues in manufacturing choose to avoid the terms – tolerable risk and residual risk? If there’s one thing “integrated safety systems” and requirements for risk assessments have brought to the industrial forefront over the past ten years – it’s risk awareness. It’s now “OK” in conversation and correspondence within companies to use words like; risk, safety, mitigation, hazard, and consequences – all in one paragraph.

    So, is there any difference between “tolerable risk” and “residual risk”?

    In my opinion, yes! First, let’s start with residual risk. Residual risk is defined by ANSI B11 – 2008 (General Safety Requirements Common to ANSI B11 Machines) as; “risk remaining after protective measures (risk reduction measures) have been taken”. Furthermore, a commonly understood fact is that there will always be some level of residual risk for a given hazard after all risk reduction measures have been applied. In other words, residual risk will never equal zero. Let’s draw this machine safety an analogy with everyday life. Almost daily we get into our automobile and drive some distance to go to the store, work, school, etc. and we have experienced the residual risk associated with this experience. Many risk reduction measures have been applied by; the automobile manufacturer, the State Department of Transportation, the highway developer, the licensing department, etc. and the local police department is the enforcement agency. Therefore, everyone in the automobile has understood the residual risk associated with this experience acknowledging that there still is some risk which means it cannot equal zero.

    Now, what is tolerable risk? Tolerable risk is defined by ANSI B11 – 2008 as; “risk that is accepted for a given task (hazard situation) or hazard. For the purpose of this standard the terms “acceptable risk” and “tolerable risk” are synonymous”. The standard goes on to say that; “The expression “acceptable risk” refers to the level at which further risk reduction will not result in significant reduction of risk; or additional expenditure of resources will not result in significant advantages of increased safety”. In my opinion, this definition means that all risk reduction measures have been taken to mitigate the given hazard in order to reduce the risk to a tolerable risk level. My experience is that various companies define tolerable risk levels which are indigenous to; their industry, their business model, the individual hazard, the competency level of employees they are able to hire, the level of local enforcement, and so forth. It’s sort of like the difference in driving a car in Lexington, Kentucky versus Mumbai, India. I would very likely define my level of tolerable risk very differently in Mumbai to the point that I probably would not even attempt to drive an automobile.

     Now, is it possible that residual risk and tolerable risk may equal the same level? Of course! However, they are very different in my opinion because of different definitions and because their approaches are very different.

    What is your opinion?

    Your comments or suggestion are always welcome so please let us know your thoughts. Submit your ideas, experiences, and challenges on this subject in the comments section below. Click on the following text if you don't see a comments box, then scroll down: Machine Guarding: Tolerable vs residual risk.

    Related articles:

Residual Risk Is Alive & Ever Present

Machine safety pays off

Contact: www.jbtitus.com for “Solutions for Machine Safety”.



No comments
The Engineers' Choice Awards highlight some of the best new control, instrumentation and automation products as chosen by...
Each year, a panel of Control Engineering editors and industry expert judges select the System Integrator of the Year Award winners.
Control Engineering Leaders Under 40 identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
Learn more about methods used to ensure that the integration between the safety system and the process control...
Adding industrial toughness and reliability to Ethernet eGuide
Technological advances like multiple-in-multiple-out (MIMO) transmitting and receiving
Virtualization advice: 4 ways splitting servers can help manufacturing; Efficient motion controls; Fill the brain drain; Learn from the HART Plant of the Year
Two sides to process safety: Combining human and technical factors in your program; Preparing HMI graphics for migrations; Mechatronics and safety; Engineers' Choice Awards
Detecting security breaches: Forensic invenstigations depend on knowing your networks inside and out; Wireless workers; Opening robotic control; Product exclusive: Robust encoders
The Ask Control Engineering blog covers all aspects of automation, including motors, drives, sensors, motion control, machine control, and embedded systems.
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
News and comments from Control Engineering process industries editor, Peter Welander.
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
This is a blog from the trenches – written by engineers who are implementing and upgrading control systems every day across every industry.
Anthony Baker is a fictitious aggregation of experts from Callisto Integration, providing manufacturing consulting and systems integration.
Integrator Guide

Integrator Guide

Search the online Automation Integrator Guide
 

Create New Listing

Visit the System Integrators page to view past winners of Control Engineering's System Integrator of the Year Award and learn how to enter the competition. You will also find more information on system integrators and Control System Integrators Association.

Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Control Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.