Machine Safety: Functional safety and the steps to be compliant in the U.S.

Who has the steps identified for anyone considering moving their machine safety compliance to functional safety for their organization? Let’s assume for this discussion that functional safety means being compliant with EN ISO 13849-1.

04/17/2012


Who has the steps identified for anyone considering moving their machine safety compliance to functional safety for their organization? Let’s assume for this discussion that functional safety means being compliant with EN ISO 13849-1.

To stay on target consider updates to your safety culture and your machine guarding solutions practice.In my opinion, having been exposed to various sources of training materials, the steps usually recommended for engineers designing machine control systems are generally as follows:

1.) Specify the safety functions

2.) Specify the required Performance Level(s) (PLr) (goal)

3.) Technically design the safety circuit(s) to achieve the safety function(s)

4.) Determine the specification of the Performance Level(s) & their quantitative value

5.) Verify

6.) Validate

7.) Document

There may be variations to the above and we’d certainly like to hear from you and your ideas. However, does this really answer the question?

If you’re the CEO, owner, or plant manager these steps don’t even come close. Nothing here addresses the business case, the cost benefit analysis, the existence of a possible mandate, the impact on employee injuries, or how to maintain compliance with existing machines while adopting and evolving over time to the new functional safety approach. For example, might a plant manager want his supplier of choice to provide a simple 5 X 7 card reflecting a comparison of PL to Cat certified components? This would obviously be needed in order to replace a Cat component with a PL component in an existing safety circuit. Certainly EN ISO 13849-1 takes this into consideration – doesn’t it?

Well, OK, maybe not. So, let’s look at our domestic application safety standards. Does anybody know of a domestic machine safety standard that addresses this issue? Will all suppliers (domestic and international) continue certifying safety components to Cat while adding PL? If so, maybe the 5 X 7 comparison card will not be required?

Has anybody seen a complete list of business steps for moving to and adopting functional safety for machine safety compliance? Is this an issue?

Your comments or suggestion are always welcome so please let us know your thoughts. Submit your ideas, experiences, and challenges on this subject in the comments section below. Click on the following text if you don't see a comments box, then scroll down: Machine Safety: functional safety and the steps to be compliant in the US.

Related articles:

Updating Minds About Machine Safety

Integrated Safety Systems: Ensuring Safety and Operational Productivity, Aberdeen Group

Machine Safety – the myths of safety cultures.

Contact: www.jbtitus.com for “Solutions for Machine Safety”.



No comments
The Engineers' Choice Awards highlight some of the best new control, instrumentation and automation products as chosen by...
Each year, a panel of Control Engineering editors and industry expert judges select the System Integrator of the Year Award winners.
Control Engineering Leaders Under 40 identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
Learn more about methods used to ensure that the integration between the safety system and the process control...
Adding industrial toughness and reliability to Ethernet eGuide
Technological advances like multiple-in-multiple-out (MIMO) transmitting and receiving
Virtualization advice: 4 ways splitting servers can help manufacturing; Efficient motion controls; Fill the brain drain; Learn from the HART Plant of the Year
Two sides to process safety: Combining human and technical factors in your program; Preparing HMI graphics for migrations; Mechatronics and safety; Engineers' Choice Awards
Detecting security breaches: Forensic invenstigations depend on knowing your networks inside and out; Wireless workers; Opening robotic control; Product exclusive: Robust encoders
The Ask Control Engineering blog covers all aspects of automation, including motors, drives, sensors, motion control, machine control, and embedded systems.
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
News and comments from Control Engineering process industries editor, Peter Welander.
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
This is a blog from the trenches – written by engineers who are implementing and upgrading control systems every day across every industry.
Anthony Baker is a fictitious aggregation of experts from Callisto Integration, providing manufacturing consulting and systems integration.
Integrator Guide

Integrator Guide

Search the online Automation Integrator Guide
 

Create New Listing

Visit the System Integrators page to view past winners of Control Engineering's System Integrator of the Year Award and learn how to enter the competition. You will also find more information on system integrators and Control System Integrators Association.

Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Control Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.