Multiple flavors of Ethernet
The evolution and proliferation of Ethernet has smoothed the path to integrating the automation space, enabling open protocols such as OPC to function optimally. This is part of a Control Engineering December cover story.
Jeanine Katzel
Although Ethernet in and of itself isn’t interoperable, its evolution and proliferation has smoothed the path to integrating the automation space, enabling open protocols such as OPC to function optimally. A number of Ethernet network variations are available today, among them Ether- Net/IP and EtherCAT.
Applying a standard Ethernet technology such as EtherNet/IP lets facilities unite disparate batch, continuous process, discrete, safety, motion, and drive control industrial network technologies into a multidisciplinary industrial network. EtherNet/IP, a network technology built on the common industrial protocol, or CIP, is managed by ODVA (www.odva.org). It can coexist with an IT Ethernet network, and is described by Rockwell Automation’s Mike Hannah as an enabler. “It is more or less the piping that allows data to move from one point to another,” he added. “Because it uses the same TCP/IP protocol stack that Ethernet uses for data, no special switches or gateways are needed when data are required to move between VLANs and subnets. This means that EtherNet/IP can be more than a fieldbus network; it can be the automation network as well, simplifying the network infrastructure.”
Another Ethernet variation, EtherCAT is an open, real-time network intended for control automation technology. This fieldbus protocol was among the innovative technologies adopted by a photovoltaic and automotive supplier recently to meet communication needs. In this case, EtherCAT acts as the primary fieldbus system and a Beckhoff Automation terminal system allows integration of peripheral devices and subsystems.
“EtherCAT is able to communicate effectively with hardware in the field unencumbered by multiple software suites and works well as a gateway to other fieldbus protocols, including the associated legacy devices,” explained EtherCAT Technology Group representative Stubbs. “It can be used for motion, complex CNC machines, and robotics, with a flexible topology that allows advanced data acquisition and high-speed performance. EtherCAT uses the controller efficiently, sorting data ahead of time, eliminating the need to map data with every I/O scan. Its use of Ethernet bandwidth efficiently translates into speed. Benefits trickle down, creating a simpler system overall.”
- Jeanine Katzel for Control Engineering, as part of the December 2010 Cover story: Integrating Disparate Control Systems.
Integrator Guide
| Search the online Automation Integrator Guide |
|
|
|
|
Visit the System Integrators page to view past winners of Control Engineering's System Integrator of the Year Award and learn how to enter the competition. You will also find more information on system integrators and Control System Integrators Association.
Case Study Database
Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Control Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.
These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.
Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.















