Poll Result
| How integrated are your maintenance, controls, and instrumentation systems? | ||||
Loosely integrated |
32% | |||
Fully integrated |
29% | |||
They're not |
22% | |||
Somewhat integrated |
16% | |||
| The Control Engineering 2013 salary survey said these factors have the most impact on job satisfaction. Which is most important to you? | ||||
Technical challenge |
59% | |||
Feeling of accomplishment |
23% | |||
Financial compensation |
7% | |||
Job security |
5% | |||
Relationship with colleagues |
3% | |||
Location |
1% | |||
| For a robotic application, what return on investment is required to justify? | ||||
Other benefits trump ROI |
46% | |||
19-24 months |
17% | |||
6-12 months |
12% | |||
13-18 months |
11% | |||
More than 24 months |
10% | |||
Less than 6 months |
2% | |||
| Would you consider buying or integrating robots for your facility with return on investment less than one year that could work side-by-side with operators and other workers, without an enclosure? | ||||
No |
69% | |||
Yes |
20% | |||
Likely |
9% | |||
Unlikely |
1% | |||
| How many robots do you expect to augment the safety and efficiency of your facility during 2013, ultimately preserving and adding jobs? | ||||
More than 50 |
80% | |||
Zero |
10% | |||
1-5 |
5% | |||
6-10 |
1% | |||
11-20 |
1% | |||
21-50 |
0% | |||
| In your applications, what is the most important function or feature of an Ethernet router? (please choose one) | ||||
Ethernet routers are not used in my applications |
53% | |||
Virtual private network (VPN) |
43% | |||
Firewall |
1% | |||
Rugged environmental specifications, designed for reliability |
0% | |||
Network address translation (NAT) port forwarding |
0% | |||
Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) |
0% | |||
Another feature or function not mentioned |
0% | |||
| Many criteria influence communication protocol selection. Of this small sample, which would you say is most important? | ||||
Open source protocol. |
69% | |||
Standard by corporate or plant-wide mandate, or primary control device. |
27% | |||
Common media, such as Ethernet. |
1% | |||
Meets a standard, such as IEC 61850 for substations. |
0% | |||
Most familiar to maintenance or engineering team. |
0% | |||
| What is the biggest barrier to adding wireless connectivity to your industrial automation infrastructure? | ||||
Not sure how to do it |
78% | |||
No barriers at all; already in place or being implemented |
10% | |||
Lack of confidence in the technology |
4% | |||
Management disinterest |
2% | |||
Marginal need |
1% | |||
Technology limitations in our facility |
1% | |||
Lack of funding |
0% | |||
| When evaluating Touch Panel Computers for an application, beside the usual desire for increased power and performance, of the definite purpose characteristics listed, which is typically most important to you? | ||||
Environmental certifications like; C1D2, ATEX, etc. |
68% | |||
Mechanical characteristics like; ease of mounting, easy access ports, etc. |
24% | |||
Rugged design like high operating temperature or shock resistance |
3% | |||
Screen characteristics like; sunlight readable, wide screen, etc. |
1% | |||
Touch input characteristics like; resistive, capacitive, etc. |
1% | |||
Circuit protection on I/O connection like serial port isolation, etc. |
0% | |||
| Do you plan to upgrade your DCS soon? | ||||
Yes, within 6 months |
68% | |||
No, I don't plan to upgrade |
29% | |||
Yes, within 12 months |
1% | |||
Yes, within 24 months |
0% | |||
Yes, within 18 months |
0% | |||
| Is RS-485 dead? If not, of the first four choices below, which one would you choose as the most significant reason RS-485 is still an important technology? | ||||
RS-485 is dead. |
73% | |||
Existing automation applications still use a lot of RS-485. |
14% | |||
RS-485 supports up to 4,000 feet between modules. |
7% | |||
Some component manufacturers still only support RS-485. |
2% | |||
Costly and viable RS-485 cable is already in place. |
2% | |||
| Where do you anticipate the challenge in upgrading the safety system? | ||||
Following applicable safety standards |
87% | |||
Design and implementation |
5% | |||
Following of Functional Safety Management System |
4% | |||
Replacing the product |
3% | |||
| If a system was certified according to IEC61508 Ed 1 as Proven in Use, can it be certified according to IEC61508 Ed 2? | ||||
I don’t care, I’ll continue to use the same system regardless of certification |
40% | |||
Provided they have documented all of the design performed according to IEC61508 Ed 1 |
34% | |||
No way |
16% | |||
Absolutely |
7% | |||
| When was the last time you performed a Hazard and Risk Analysis on your site? | ||||
Last year |
47% | |||
I have a safety system, why should I do that? |
32% | |||
5 years ago |
10% | |||
10 years ago |
10% | |||
| Please check the answer that better represents you. I normally recommend or select a safety system because: | ||||
I follow the Safety Requirement Specification (SIL based) |
56% | |||
I’m following the corporate standard |
31% | |||
Nobody is going to challenge my decision to buy TMR |
8% | |||
I’ve always used that architecture in my plant |
4% | |||
| Why would you use isolated signal conditioners to connect your analog I/O signals? | ||||
Isolate ground loops |
46% | |||
Input short-circuit protection to your system |
13% | |||
Eliminate crosstalk |
11% | |||
Add over-range protection to your system |
11% | |||
Reject AC and DC common-mode voltages |
11% | |||
Tolerate very high common-mode voltages |
5% | |||
| How important is energy management to your company? | ||||
We monitor and work to control energy use in all parts of our plant/process. |
42% | |||
We are exploring how we can monitor energy use. |
21% | |||
We haven’t started the process. |
21% | |||
We monitor and work to control energy use in some areas that are large consumers. |
7% | |||
We are already implementing some monitoring efforts in key areas. |
7% | |||
| Which of these PLC programming languages does your company’s controls engineering team utilize most frequently? | ||||
Ladder diagram (LD) |
63% | |||
Function block diagram (FBD) |
20% | |||
C/C++ |
5% | |||
Structured text (ST) |
5% | |||
Sequential function chart (SFC) |
2% | |||
Other |
1% | |||
Instruction list (IL) |
0% | |||
| What areas of control and automation education are most useful? (See our online video training area.) | ||||
Switches, Circuits, PLC Basics |
27% | |||
Sensors and I/O Modules |
23% | |||
Other |
17% | |||
Motors and Drives |
16% | |||
Variable Frequency Drives |
14% | |||
| This month, are you attending or did you attend... | ||||
More than one of these |
52% | |||
Siemens Automation Summit |
16% | |||
Rockwell Automation RSTechEd |
8% | |||
Local or traveling seminar |
8% | |||
Honeywell Users Group Americas |
4% | |||
Sensors Expo |
4% | |||
Embedded System Conference Chicago |
4% | |||
Other industry show or conference |
4% | |||
| May ISM numbers show slower manufacturing growth from Japan quake supply chain disruption. How’s your Q2 2011 so far? | ||||
Uncertain |
41% | |||
Low single-digit growth |
12% | |||
Slightly down |
12% | |||
High double-digit growth |
9% | |||
High single-digit growth |
9% | |||
Low double-digit growth |
6% | |||
Flat |
6% | |||
Moderately down |
0% | |||
Down big |
0% | |||
| Which Industrial Ethernet system do you currently use or plan to use as your primary machine/plant networking protocol within the next 6 – 12 months? | ||||
SERCOS III |
42% | |||
EtherNet/IP |
26% | |||
Modbus TCP/IP |
11% | |||
PROFINET |
9% | |||
EtherCAT |
3% | |||
Ethernet-Powerlink |
2% | |||
None |
2% | |||
Other Industrial Ethernet protocol |
1% | |||
| Which PLC communication protocol do you use? | ||||
EthernetIP |
45% | |||
Modbus |
28% | |||
Profibus DP |
14% | |||
Devicenet |
7% | |||
CANopen |
4% | |||
| When selecting a wireless vendor what do you consider most important? | ||||
Technical Service |
39% | |||
Features |
27% | |||
Reputation |
14% | |||
Price |
13% | |||
Other |
5% | |||
| Which Engineers’
Choice Award
criteria is most
important in
selecting the best
product? Also see
www.controleng.com
under Events
and awards. | ||||
Technological advancement |
50% | |||
They’re equal |
24% | |||
Service to the industry |
21% | |||
Market impact |
3% | |||
| I would consider
submitting a Tips
and Tricks entry
under the events
and awards area at
www.controleng.com
because it might: | ||||
Help others |
29% | |||
All of these reasons |
29% | |||
Provide fame & glory |
17% | |||
Help my resume |
11% | |||
Improve manufacturing |
11% | |||
| I would consider a medium-voltage drive (600 V to 15 kV) because ... ? | ||||
A through D |
47% | |||
A. Higher supply voltages decrease losses, increase drive efficiency, save energy and money compared to lower voltage drives |
18% | |||
None of the above, but I'll read the Aug.'10 MV drives cover story. |
17% | |||
D. Less complexity, size, and weight without transformer |
6% | |||
B. Harmonics mitigation |
5% | |||
C. Cable and conduit savings |
4% | |||
| In your experience, which main problem area do you find most troublesome in your plant?
| ||||
Equipment malfunctions and maintenance problems |
50% | |||
Process design and control strategy issues |
30% | |||
Incorrect hardware selection and sizing |
10% | |||
Variability in feedstocks and internal systems |
8% | |||

