4 levels of asset reliability at steelmaker ArcelorMittal

Effective planning leads to effective maintenance, which ArcelorMittal learned during the economic downturn

10/29/2013


In building its World Class Equipment Reliability System at global steelmaker ArcelorMittal, USA maintenance division manager Scott Piech noted that the company had to teach some old dogs some new tricks.

“There was a lot of winning over folks who were doing things a certain way for a lot of years,” said Piech at the 2013 Bentley Systems Year In Infrastructure event in London on Oct. 29. “It takes a lot of coaching to convince them that it’s the right thing to do.”

Overcoming worker skepticism and a recession that slowed the process, the message seems to have taken hold. ArcelorMittal was one of three finalists for the Bentley award in Asset Performance Management.

Changing management always is a challenge, and it was for this company as well. “We thought the journey of going from reactive maintenance to proactive maintenance would take three to five years. It’s going to take seven to 10 years,” Piech said. The 2008 recession slowed their efforts to convert all U.S. plants to the WCER System, and the effort was streamlined to focus on critical areas.

“When we started the program,” Piech said, “the market for steel was red-hot. Tried to implement in all departments, but then the downturn hit and we didn’t have the resources. We just couldn’t do it for everything, so we focused on critical areas within the plants.” 

Piech said there were four primary levels of reliability at ArcelorMittal:

  • Planning and scheduling
  • Autonomous maintenance
  • Pareto and root cause failure analysis (RCFA)
  • Proactive maintenance  

While all were important, planning and schedule were the keys, especially in the retraining effort. “Planning and scheduling is the backbone of what you do,” said Piech. “If you’re not doing effective planning and scheduling, you’re not really doing good maintenance. We trained everyone at our USA plants to do this.

“Now have operators doing inspections. We were trying to get rid of that old idea where operators operate and maintainers maintain. We want everyone to own the equipment.”

They also rerouted maintenance workers from predictable routes to ones based on the analysis of data through the Bentley Ivara system. While some workers migrated to work orders through handheld or tablet devices, others continued to use paper. While the system didn’t require a preference, Piech has seen an uptick with tablet use lately. “When workers are going to be doing their inspection routes, the information can be downloaded to the tablets.”

Piech made several other key points:

  • There is a manager for proactive maintenance separate from a manager for planning and for corrective maintenance. “Firefighting always seems to come first, especially in maintenance,” he said.
  • The company knows some of its maintenance personnel have upwards of 30 years of experience. That experience will be retiring soon. “The people we hire as maintenance personnel will require a lot of training,” he said. That’s why standardizing training, maintenance and metrics was so important to the overall rollout of the WCER System at ArcelorMittal.
  • And as in most cases, good maintenance often goes overlooked. Maintenance only becomes visible when something breaks. “If you’re doing great maintenance, you’re there to support production,” Piech said.


Anonymous , 11/15/13 08:38 AM:

1. What is 'autonomous maintnenance'?

2.Is 'proactive maintenance' = TPM?
Anonymous , 11/15/13 08:49 PM:

I am trying to change 100 years of reactive maintenance into planned maintenance in one of the biggest mining company in the World and I think that I perfectly understand to Mr. Piech when he said that they "...had to teach some old dogs some new tricks". Is a very hard work!...I would like to know if it is possible that Mr. Peach come to south america for a conference?
The Engineers' Choice Awards highlight some of the best new control, instrumentation and automation products as chosen by...
Each year, a panel of Control Engineering editors and industry expert judges select the System Integrator of the Year Award winners.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
Learn how to increase device reliability in harsh environments and decrease unplanned system downtime.
This eGuide contains a series of articles and videos that considers theoretical and practical; immediate needs and a look into the future.
Learn how to create value with re-use; gain productivity with lean automation and connectivity, and optimize panel design and construction.
Go deep: Automation tackles offshore oil challenges; Ethernet advice; Wireless robotics; Product exclusives; Digital edition exclusives
Lost in the gray scale? How to get effective HMIs; Best practices: Integrate old and new wireless systems; Smart software, networks; Service provider certifications
Fixing PID: Part 2: Tweaking controller strategy; Machine safety networks; Salary survey and career advice; Smart I/O architecture; Product exclusives
The Ask Control Engineering blog covers all aspects of automation, including motors, drives, sensors, motion control, machine control, and embedded systems.
Look at the basics of industrial wireless technologies, wireless concepts, wireless standards, and wireless best practices with Daniel E. Capano of Diversified Technical Services Inc.
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
This is a blog from the trenches – written by engineers who are implementing and upgrading control systems every day across every industry.
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.

Find and connect with the most suitable service provider for your unique application. Start searching the Global System Integrator Database Now!

Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Control Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.