Attacking abnormalities head-on prevents future maintenance problems

Properly reporting abnormalities early on can improve an organization's safety and promote effective maintenace practices.

03/27/2014


What we notice:

PLE1403_WEB_SMRP_P-F Curve

The abnormalities that lead to failures often fly below our radar. The ability to change our thinking or refine our attention to look for abnormalities is a critical step in transforming from a reactive to proactive organization. Reactive organizations attribute their performance to bad luck, whereas proactive organizations make their own luck. In general, all abnormalities eventually become functional failures, and it is our choice to address the on our terms (proactively) or when the equipment demands it (reactively).

If we do not report abnormalities early, or strive to report only those ambiguous “really important ones,” we are selling ourselves short. When we fail to report abnormalities early, we loose the ability to address them early.  We must report them in an official way as soon as we see them.  When I say reporting in an official way, I mean something like putting a work request into our CMMS system or using an abnormality tag that is part of our Operator Care process.  This collection of official notifications represent what we know to be our backlog, and a full and rich backlog is critical to our proactive approach to maintenance.

I talk to many people who tell me, I only want people to report the “important or critical problems.”  Guess what, todays unimportant problem will quickly become tomorrow’s important one. Better to have a solid reporting system, a simple method to prioritize work, so we are attacking the most important abnormalities first, as well as a robust and visual means to communicate our progress to everyone who participates in the process (managers, and technicians, operations and maintenance).

Definitions: Abnormality and Failure:

So what is the difference between an abnormality and a failure?  First of all, I prefer to use the phrase “functional failure” rather than simply “failure.”  I have to really concentrate and force myself to use these words, but it has an important effect on my thinking and the thinking of those around me.  To me, Failure seems to be an arbitrary word open to interpretation.  

The loss of a function or a functional failure, on the other hand, is quite clear because I can no longer do what I desire to do.  In each case if we start with that condition that we desire, the loss of this ability or function becomes quite clear.

  Examples:
    - If the light bulb goes out, then I can no longer read my book – loss of function.  
    - If the impeller wears on my pump and can no longer produce my product in the required quantity – loss of function.
    - If my tire goes flat and I can no longer drive my car at full speed – loss of function.
    - Abnormalities, on the other hand, are the clues that our assets provide to us that something is wrong and that we are on that
      pathway to loosing our desired function. 

Failures, Abnormalities and the P-F Curve Explained

The pathway to functional failure, and the abnormalities that mark this path, is best described by the P-F curve. The definition and meaning behind the P-F Curve is quite simple and powerful.

Let’s review the P-F Curve in detail:

The vertical axis represents our equipment condition while the horizontal axis represents time.
  -The higher the equipment condition the better.
  -The first point on the graph (upper left hand corner) is labeled “the point where the failure starts to occur.”  Lets consider this point
    P.  
        -Example: Imagine that we forget to lubricate the bearings on an electric motor.  Eventually all of the grease will evaporate
         out, leaving metal to metal contact. This is point P in this example.
  -The equipment (asset) starts to degrade, losing its condition slowly at first, but then increasing in speed as time continues on. As
    this process continues, the equipment provides us with clues that inform us of what is happening – at first very subtle clues, but
    increasing in magnitude (and our urgency I hope) as the process continue.  These clues are the abnormalities we speak of.
  -If we do not act proactively to the abnormalities, we will reach the point labeled “equipment fails here.”  This is point F or the point
   of Functional Failure.
  -Because we have failed to react proactively to the abnormalities, we will now have to react to the functional failure – the choice
   has been made for us!

 



No comments
The Engineers' Choice Awards highlight some of the best new control, instrumentation and automation products as chosen by...
Each year, a panel of Control Engineering editors and industry expert judges select the System Integrator of the Year Award winners.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
Learn how to increase device reliability in harsh environments and decrease unplanned system downtime.
This eGuide contains a series of articles and videos that considers theoretical and practical; immediate needs and a look into the future.
Learn how to create value with re-use; gain productivity with lean automation and connectivity, and optimize panel design and construction.
Go deep: Automation tackles offshore oil challenges; Ethernet advice; Wireless robotics; Product exclusives; Digital edition exclusives
Lost in the gray scale? How to get effective HMIs; Best practices: Integrate old and new wireless systems; Smart software, networks; Service provider certifications
Fixing PID: Part 2: Tweaking controller strategy; Machine safety networks; Salary survey and career advice; Smart I/O architecture; Product exclusives
The Ask Control Engineering blog covers all aspects of automation, including motors, drives, sensors, motion control, machine control, and embedded systems.
Look at the basics of industrial wireless technologies, wireless concepts, wireless standards, and wireless best practices with Daniel E. Capano of Diversified Technical Services Inc.
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
This is a blog from the trenches – written by engineers who are implementing and upgrading control systems every day across every industry.
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.

Find and connect with the most suitable service provider for your unique application. Start searching the Global System Integrator Database Now!

Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Control Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.