Can the legacy of fieldbus ever be replaced by industrial Ethernet?

While the fieldbus war may be over, the battle for industrial Ethernet vs. traditional fieldbus technologies is coming. The future looks strong for industrial Ethernet, but we probably aren't going to see the last of fieldbus for many years.

07/30/2014


There is no doubt that the fieldbus wars had a resounding effect on industrial communications. The technologies they offered and the vast amount of press about them created a difficult environment to select just one, especially when many of them were standardized by the International Eelectronic Commission. While that war may be over now, the next battle is industrial Ethernet vs. traditional fieldbus technologies.

IHS Technology has been examining the markets for industrial Ethernet and fieldbus for over 13 years now. The latest edition of the study has recently published and the findings show a gradual move towards industrial Ethernet solutions. Although fieldbus outweighed Ethernet at approximately 2.7:1 in 2012 - Figure 1 shows the ratio of fieldbus to Ethernet nodes; this is forecast to decrease to approximately 2.1:1 in 2017. The use of industrial Ethernet is slowly increasing but it is likely to take many years before it overtakes fieldbus in terms of new node connections. Initial forecasts put Ethernet as being the predominant technology (greater than 51% of new nodes) in 2030.

Figure 1 shows the ratio of fieldbus to Ethernet nodes; this is forecast to decrease to approximately 2.1:1 in 2017. Courtesy: IHS Technology

Figure 2 shows the increase in the number of new Ethernet nodes vs. the decrease in market share of fieldbus technologies. Overall, this share is forecast to decrease slowly, despite a large number of new Ethernet nodes being implemented. This is because many more new fieldbus nodes are still installed each year than new Ethernet nodes-even though Ethernet is likely to become the predominant technology in the future. The legacy of fieldbus technologies remains extensive, having been around since the late 1970's. And these older technologies aren't simply going to disappear. Users of fieldbus technology, for instance, are advocates of their simplicity and reliability. This is unlikely to change without active engagement by automation vendors and protocol associations to promote Ethernet and the benefits of transitioning. Moreover, the use of these fresher technologies as the main source of networking is likely to be implemented only in newer plants and factories.

Figure 2 shows the increase in the number of new Ethernet nodes vs. the decrease in market share of fieldbus technologies. Courtesy: IHS Technology

Process automation in particular is very fieldbus centric, with Profibus, HART, and Foundation Fieldbus standing out as leading technologies. The slow moving nature of process automation and high cost of facility upgrades mean that fieldbus solutions will continue to be widespread long time to come. The intricate and extensive wiring of process facilities, together with large scale, also mean that refits are a last resort. If the current networking backbone works then it's very likely to be changed.

The huge legacy of fieldbus is somewhat of an issue in terms of new ideas and innovations. There is little room for innovation when users become comfortable (over many years) with what they're using. There can be major backlashes from users when changes are implemented (Windows 8 and Microsoft's reversal of removing the start button is a good example). Continued use of older technologies is obviously useful for users wishing to run a plant with existing, and knowledgeable engineers, but it does mean there is potential to miss out on the advantages that newer technologies offer.

Some of the latest gains in terms of factory efficiency and reduced down-time are best felt on industrial Ethernet networks. Power saving protocols, integrated safety, as well as aspects of 'factory of the future' can be implemented much more easily on Ethernet. Retraining engineers who have used the same technology for 30 years can be prohibitively difficult, however, so it often falls to younger engineers to promote the advantages of newer technologies.

One of the major trends seen by IHS during research was the buzz around "Industry 4.0" or "Smart Manufacturing". This next step in the evolution of the industrial environment revolves around several sub-trends including big-data, pervasive sensing, and mobility. Although it is still in its infancy, the concept is drumming up further interest in industrial Ethernet solutions, which in turn could potentially boost other trends leading to "Industry 4.0". Mobility also brings in the use of wireless communication, which is already most commonly used with process measurement devices. The ability to monitor and control many applications from anywhere in the facility will prove beneficial if the stigma over reliability and security can be overcome.

In the short term, fieldbus technologies are certainly suitable for many industrial applications. However, long term, industrial Ethernet will be more widely adopted, leading to efficiency gains, more flexibility, remote access, better diagnostics, faster networking and the ability to integrate the factory floor with the enterprise environment. Overall, the future looks strong for industrial Ethernet, but we aren't going to see the last of fieldbus for many years.

IHS Technology has research teams focused on automotive, industrial automation, physical security, gaming, digital signage and cellular communications. Bringing together these industry experts, in turn, has helped provide for the first time a substantive overview of the size, penetration rate and forecast growth of the embedded vision market.

Tom Moore is an analyst with IHS Technology. He is part of the Industrial Automation group and focuses on the industrial Ethernet, fieldbus and wireless communications research. Tom is also responsible for the industrial communications quarterly index. Edited by Joy Chang, Digital Project Manager, CFE Media, jchang@cfemedia.com 



Phil , Quebec, Canada, 08/06/14 09:36 AM:

Thanks for the helpful article.
Couldn't help notice however that the graphs are very confusing.. the y-axis on figure 1 is nearly useless without decimal points and then figure 2 is simply incomprehensible, with two y-axes, no legend, and an undefined x-axis.
Robert , , 08/14/14 10:43 AM:

Agree with Phil's comments and would advocate the wireless networks to replace the fieldbus; with due caution regarding any system that can be vulnerable to cyber attacks!
DICK , IN, United States, 08/14/14 11:32 AM:

Phil - Agreed - Such lack of attention to detail does a disservice to their reporting - which is quite interesting for me.
Anonymous , 04/18/15 02:22 PM:

Various industrial Ethernet protocols like PROFINET, EtherNet/IP, and Modbus/TCP are increasingly used at the I/O level instead of their "H2" fieldbus counterparts PROFIBUS-DP, DeviceNet, and Modbus/RTU

The other question is what will take the place of 4-20 mA and on-off signals for field instruments? We don't see Ethernet in field instruments like pressure and temperature transmitters or control valves. I believe instead "H1" fieldbuses like FOUNDATION fieldbus, PROFIBUS, IO-link, CompoNet, and ASI etc. will take the place of 4-20 mA and on-off signals. Ethernet is not a good fit at the sensor/actuator level.
Jonas , Singapore, 04/18/15 02:28 PM:

Various industrial Ethernet protocols like PROFINET, EtherNet/IP, and Modbus/TCP are increasingly used at the I/O level instead of their "H2" fieldbus counterparts PROFIBUS-DP, DeviceNet, and Modbus/RTU

The other question is what will take the place of 4-20 mA and on-off signals for field instruments? We don't see Ethernet in field instruments like pressure and temperature transmitters or control valves. I believe instead "H1" fieldbuses like FOUNDATION fieldbus, PROFIBUS, IO-link, CompoNet, and ASI etc. will take the place of 4-20 mA and on-off signals. Ethernet is not a good fit at the sensor/actuator level.
The Engineers' Choice Awards highlight some of the best new control, instrumentation and automation products as chosen by...
The System Integrator Giants program lists the top 100 system integrators among companies listed in CFE Media's Global System Integrator Database.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
This eGuide illustrates solutions, applications and benefits of machine vision systems.
Learn how to increase device reliability in harsh environments and decrease unplanned system downtime.
This eGuide contains a series of articles and videos that considers theoretical and practical; immediate needs and a look into the future.
Sensor-to-cloud interoperability; PID and digital control efficiency; Alarm management system design; Automotive industry advances
Make Big Data and Industrial Internet of Things work for you, 2017 Engineers' Choice Finalists, Avoid control design pitfalls, Managing IIoT processes
Engineering Leaders Under 40; System integration improving packaging operation; Process sensing; PID velocity; Cybersecurity and functional safety
This article collection contains several articles on the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) and how it is transforming manufacturing.

Find and connect with the most suitable service provider for your unique application. Start searching the Global System Integrator Database Now!

SCADA at the junction, Managing risk through maintenance, Moving at the speed of data
Flexible offshore fire protection; Big Data's impact on operations; Bridging the skills gap; Identifying security risks
The digital oilfield: Utilizing Big Data can yield big savings; Virtualization a real solution; Tracking SIS performance
click me