Control Engineering Online Update for January 13, 2006


Control Engineering Online Update - Technology

January 13, 2006


Sponsored by Control Engineering

Cost targets, an important component of design-to-cost strategies, are being defined earlier down to the individual-component level. As a result, companies need to meet cost targets at product launch and avoid expensive post-production cost-reduction phases.

Cost Management for Discrete Part Manufacturing

Today’s NPI (new product introduction) process is cross-functional, including internal functions and external suppliers or partners. Product and target costs are key components and central to daily decisions. An NPI infrastructure should include mechanisms for providing data collaboratively and continuously to all who need them as a product moves from concept to launch.

Costing approaches use such methodologies as simple weight-based assessments, “like component” comparisons, and detailed routings using activity based costing systems. Some are better than others; trade-offs exist between the level of cost detail and the time spent obtaining the information.

Cost-estimating early in the NPI process is important. More than 70% of final product costs are typically determined by early design decisions. However, engineers generally use few cost-estimating tools. A practical costing tool used must be accurate, flexible, simple, timely, and economical.

For many manufacturing firms, launching products over cost target is the rule. A solution must provide seamless cost analysis from early concept to full production and delivery after launch. A viable cost management solution must support all stages and functions of the organization throughout the entire product lifecycle.

A cost management platform
The primary function of a cost management platform is to collaboratively identify, assess, reduce, avoid, or recover material, tooling, labor, and overhead costs in discrete part manufacturing companies. Since a high percentage of cost is committed early, and only a small portion can be affected later, the cost management architecture must generate accurate cost predictions early and providing timely information to the cost community. It is necessary to integrate directly into the CAD environment and leverage its geometry information to automate cost analysis and close the loop, not only for the design function but the entire NPI community.

Figure 1 shows a simplified system diagram of a cost management platform. At its heart is a cost modeling and calculation engine. As the designer uses the CAD system, the cost modeling engine automatically derives and extracts geometric cost drivers (GCDs), interrogating the cost management database to obtain necessary information about potential manufacturing facilities or suppliers, non-geometric cost drivers (n-GCDs), and returning the current manufacturing cost estimate to the designer. The process is repeated with each revision. All in the cost community have access and input to the process and receive feedback as cost estimates change.

Figure 1

Real-time CAD integrated cost management
Engineering has the most impact on cost in the conceptual phase. A real-time CAD integrated costing environment gives the designer an interactive tool for what-if trade off’s between design and cost. Cost becomes a fourth element in the form, fit, and function balancing act and becomes an inherent and actively used attribute in the design process. A designer must understand the interactions of all four. This requires real time cost feedback in an integrated CAD environment.

The feedback returns summary cost information: material cost, labor cost, machine overhead cost, capital tooling, and overall total cost per part. Each time the design is modified, everyone involved can see the cost-relevant results of that design decision. Real-time integrated costing creates a powerful environment for what-if analysis, while supporting a creative and productive design process.

Geometric and non-geometric cost drivers; cost modeling
Three factors must be considered to accurately predict costs during a product design lifecycle:

  • Geometric cost drivers (GCDs), which account for part sizes and shapes as they evolve through the design process;

  • Non-geometric cost drivers, which account for production facilities where the parts will be manufactured including capabilities, capacities, and cost structures; and

  • A cost model, which represents the appropriate cost accounting methodologies used by the manufacturer.

Geometry assessment —GCDs provide an abstraction of the cost drivers based on part geometry and cost information for use outside the CAD environment. For example, GCD data for a sheet metal part include holes, cutouts, bends, and part thickness. GCDs for turned parts include grooves, bores, faces, shoulders, and threads. Only a small amount of data is needed to define a part, especially if the major process group is known.

Production facilities —Non-GCDs characterize the production facility. They include unique cost drivers such as labor rates, overhead rates, machine tool parameters, routings, and raw material parameters.

Cost modeling —The cost model needs to use GCD and n-GCD information. The ideal approach would be to calculate manufacturing process time, then convert time to cost. The time models need to describe the physical activities that occur on each machine. There are two components for each process:

  • Physical time models that simulate the step-by-step actions of the machine as it produces a part;

  • Labor time models that account for the less-deterministic times associated with manual operations.

A CAD -integrated cost management solution is required to provide timely product cost information throughout the NPI process. In real time, the solution needs to compute individual part costs and complete the roll-up of costs from sub-assembly level through the complete product.

Costs need to be computed at any stage of the NPI process to provide access to information to collaborate on, analyze, report, and manage product costs. Traditional cost estimation techniques require hours to generate and are often inaccurate or invalid if changes are made. A modern cost management platform must provide fast cost estimates and automatic updates, allowing changes to made early in the development cycle when they are less expensive.

By providing real-time, predictive cost estimates throughout the NPI process, CAD-integrated cost management helps produce better decisions that reduce, avoid, or recover product costs. It gives designers instantaneous cost, offers valuable “should cost” data to procurement, and provides production level costs to manufacturing, months or years before production occurs.

Michael Philpott, Ph.D., is co-founder and CTO for aPriori. Eric Hiller is co-founder and director of business development for aPriori. aPriori develops cost management software solutions for the discrete manufacturing.

No comments
The Engineers' Choice Awards highlight some of the best new control, instrumentation and automation products as chosen by...
Each year, a panel of Control Engineering editors and industry expert judges select the System Integrator of the Year Award winners.
Control Engineering Leaders Under 40 identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
Learn more about methods used to ensure that the integration between the safety system and the process control...
Adding industrial toughness and reliability to Ethernet eGuide
Technological advances like multiple-in-multiple-out (MIMO) transmitting and receiving
Big plans for small nuclear reactors: Simpler, safer control designs; Smarter manufacturing; Industrial cloud; Mobile HMI; Controls convergence
Virtualization advice: 4 ways splitting servers can help manufacturing; Efficient motion controls; Fill the brain drain; Learn from the HART Plant of the Year
Two sides to process safety: Combining human and technical factors in your program; Preparing HMI graphics for migrations; Mechatronics and safety; Engineers' Choice Awards
The Ask Control Engineering blog covers all aspects of automation, including motors, drives, sensors, motion control, machine control, and embedded systems.
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
News and comments from Control Engineering process industries editor, Peter Welander.
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
This is a blog from the trenches – written by engineers who are implementing and upgrading control systems every day across every industry.
Anthony Baker is a fictitious aggregation of experts from Callisto Integration, providing manufacturing consulting and systems integration.
Integrator Guide

Integrator Guide

Search the online Automation Integrator Guide

Create New Listing

Visit the System Integrators page to view past winners of Control Engineering's System Integrator of the Year Award and learn how to enter the competition. You will also find more information on system integrators and Control System Integrators Association.

Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Control Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.