Female engineers should get creative

An enhanced focus on creativity in engineering along with a reduced emphasis on classical tool collection may encourage women students to remain in the profession.


Graham Allan is a professor in the chemical engineering department and in the college of the environment of the University of Washington in Seattle.The November 2013 editorial “Wanted: Female Engineers” prompts this piece. I’m a chemical engineering professor, the husband of a female engineer, the father of two daughters, the grandfather of five females, and the great-grandfather of six great-granddaughters. Thus, from personal experience, the question “Are females different from males?” is easy to answer. Young or old, they most certainly are! So it should be no surprise to find that female engineers are also different from their male counterparts, before and after formal graduation. But do we want female engineers to be different?

Of course we do, because the profession needs different approaches for all problems—and women can supply these. However, it seems to be well-established that only about one-tenth of employed engineers are women and this fraction clearly should be substantially greater. Unfortunately, the dropout rate of women students in the engineering disciplines is high, and this must be reduced if the total number of female engineers in the profession is to be augmented.

To encourage women to enter and remain in this currently male-dominated profession, this gender difference must be recognized and rewarded. How is this to be done? Unfortunately, there are many adverse misconceptions out there, discouraging women, propagated by the President on down, that must be dispelled. Foremost among these is the propagandizing use of the acronym STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics), which is widely proclaimed to be the key to an engineering career in the future.

Notwithstanding this misinformation, ask yourself: Could either the President or the First Lady solve a differential equation today? Recall that when undergraduates, both on their way to law school, taking math, chemistry, or physics was mandatory. However, these are only tools. They’re very wonderful and powerful, but still just tools. Often, like the fancy screwdriver in a toolbox, they’re never used.

Ideas are actually needed in real life as well as in an engineering career. These originate from creativity. This is a mental quality that every girl and woman already possesses and only needs to be released by encouragement. An engineer, male or female, can go for years without using some of the tools learned in formal classes, but creativity is demanded every day. Here is an important example that every female engineer can contemplate without being “good” at math, physics, or chemistry: “What will the diaper look like 10 years from now?”

Stimulating questions like this are asked at the University of Washington Chemical Engineering Department in Seattle, as part of a Creativity & Innovation course that is taken by some 200 students every spring quarter. A related online offering, Creativity & Society, is now available fall, winter, and summer.

About half of the students in these classes are young women. The class requirements include keeping a “creative idea diary” where items of creativity are recorded daily. In the wrap-up class evaluations, women often state how much they have enjoyed this assignment. Comments like this do not turn up in conventional STEM class evaluations. For the midterm exam, all students must select one of their 50 or so new ideas and define the first innovation step needed to carry the idea forward to reality. An account of what happened when this was attempted is the basis for the final exam. Again, women students report especially enjoying the novel challenges of the combination of creativity and innovation in the midterm and final exams, rather than the typical regurgitation of old problems called for in standard STEM tests.

Elon Musk, founder of SpaceX and a key player at other companies, was recently featured on CNN’s GPS with Fareed Zakaria. In the interview, which focused on how truly creative people excel, Musk said that, in regard to creativity, “the first order of business is to try.” He went on to explain that “You have to think until your brain hurts.” Without creativity—and a good solid education in physics or engineering—new concepts will not be created.

Although only anecdotal, these observations over many years suggest that an enhanced focus on the importance of creativity in engineering together with a reduced emphasis on classical tool collection would encourage women students to remain in the profession. Why? Because exercising one’s creativity every day is exciting as well as fun. Together engineering then becomes an enjoyable career for women and a female engineer a more valuable person in any organization.

Graham Allan is a professor in the chemical engineering department and in the college of the environment of the University of Washington in Seattle. He has written more than 300 technical articles and book chapters, has been awarded about 70 patents, and consults for both industry and federal authorities. 

young , South Korea, 02/09/14 03:54 PM:

I enjoyed Prof. G. Graham Allan's article very much. As one of his former PhD students at the University of Washington, I am teaching "Creativity & Innovation" class at a university in Seoul, Korea. I noticed that female students were particularly attentive and enjoyed the class very much. In Korea, practically it is the moms that direct their children's education. So, educating female engineers on "Creativity & Innovation" will be a very effective tool to raise the children to become a member of a creative society. Thanks. Young Ko, PhD, President, SCAP-Tech
Anonymous , 02/27/14 04:04 PM:

I am afraid that idea of replacing tools with creativity (please try to fix your sink without tools with all your creativity) promotes the next generation of sharlatans in the engineering field. It is true that one can become a great inventor without being a technical genius (Steve Jobs -?!); however, behind every great inventor is a team of great technical experts.
Rhonda , NM, United States, 03/04/14 11:50 AM:

While I agree that you cannot replace a toolbox with creativity, I don't believe that was the intent of the article. There are people who excel at the technical side of engineering, and some are better at the creative side. Still, for most engineering jobs, both sides are needed. As a female engineer, I have to agree that the side I more enjoy, is the creative aspects of my job. And although I studied, and am capable of calculating differential equations, I almost never use them in my work ("the fancy screwdriver"). Just one take on this from the 10%.
Jennifer , CT, United States, 03/04/14 05:11 PM:

I am extremely disappointed in the level of condescension in this article. "every female engineer can contemplate without being “good” at math, physics, or chemistry: 'What will the diaper look like 10 years from now?'"

Are you kidding??

As one of the "females" in the engineering field, technical ability is not the primary reason women leave. It's beliefs like this that say we are different, less capable, less interested in participating. It's not only the college environment- it's the workplace especially. How many times have I been passed over for field work because it's assumed I don't want to "get dirty" (read: experience), spoken to differently (read: inclusion), and been told that I am somehow more special than other women for embarking on, and staying in, an industry that interested me, despite these managerial offenses.

Creativity is always a welcome commodity in any engineering field, but curiosity based in science is better. In either case, don't ever pretend that science can be replaced, and don't weaken the field by allowing graduates who do not excel in these areas. Would you employ a firefighter even if she couldn't carry the equipment? Of course not. But you would if she was able to carry you out of that burning building. The question is, would she stay if she was treated as "other"?

The answer to women remaining in engineering as much about engaging girls early in their schooling as it is about treating them fairly and equally in the workplace. Success means asking them and requiring them to participate, showing students what is possible and employees what is required. It means listening to their ideas with the same level of intention as their male counterparts. It means not fearing that they'll take their manager to HR if they interact more than once a week.

One of the best aspects of math and science is that equations and equipment don't care what gender you are. An unfortunate aspect of people is that some of them care very much, and write articles like this. So don't pretend women don't continue in engineering because they can't. Can't and Won't are very different things.

Jennifer Thurber, PE
Senior Mechanical Engineer
The Engineers' Choice Awards highlight some of the best new control, instrumentation and automation products as chosen by...
Each year, a panel of Control Engineering editors and industry expert judges select the System Integrator of the Year Award winners.
Control Engineering Leaders Under 40 identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
Learn more about methods used to ensure that the integration between the safety system and the process control...
Adding industrial toughness and reliability to Ethernet eGuide
Technological advances like multiple-in-multiple-out (MIMO) transmitting and receiving
Virtualization advice: 4 ways splitting servers can help manufacturing; Efficient motion controls; Fill the brain drain; Learn from the HART Plant of the Year
Two sides to process safety: Combining human and technical factors in your program; Preparing HMI graphics for migrations; Mechatronics and safety; Engineers' Choice Awards
Detecting security breaches: Forensic invenstigations depend on knowing your networks inside and out; Wireless workers; Opening robotic control; Product exclusive: Robust encoders
The Ask Control Engineering blog covers all aspects of automation, including motors, drives, sensors, motion control, machine control, and embedded systems.
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
News and comments from Control Engineering process industries editor, Peter Welander.
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
This is a blog from the trenches – written by engineers who are implementing and upgrading control systems every day across every industry.
Anthony Baker is a fictitious aggregation of experts from Callisto Integration, providing manufacturing consulting and systems integration.
Integrator Guide

Integrator Guide

Search the online Automation Integrator Guide

Create New Listing

Visit the System Integrators page to view past winners of Control Engineering's System Integrator of the Year Award and learn how to enter the competition. You will also find more information on system integrators and Control System Integrators Association.

Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Control Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.