I don’t have to upgrade my machine safety to the latest technology

I’ll bet nearly everyone reading this blog has heard someone say, “I don’t have to upgrade my machine safety to the latest technology.” Right? And, the next comment might be something like, “My shop is safe because we haven’t had an accident for umpteen years.” Are these folks wrong? Here are 5 questions to ask about machine safety.

08/10/2011


JB Titus, CFSEI’ll bet nearly everyone reading this blog has heard someone say, “I don’t have to upgrade my machine safety to the latest technology.” Right? And, the next comment might be something like, “My shop is safe because we haven’t had an accident for umpteen years.” Are these folks wrong? (See below, the 5 most important questions to ask when confronted with these views on machine safety.)

   How many of you think they’re right? Well, in my opinion about half of you are partially right. Why is this possibly true?

   To begin with both OSHA and the consensus standards will say that basic solutions like hard guarding, personnel training, signage, personal protective equipment, etc. are acceptable machine guarding solutions. Neither OSHA or the consensus standards will require industry to adopt and install the latest technology for machine guarding. Then, what’s different today? Who has the answer? OK, I’ll lay one answer out there.

                                    It’s the Risk Assessment!

   Now that a risk assessment is required by all on all machinery every hazard must now be identified and mitigated to an acceptable level. Having said that - there’s still no mandate for industry to change machine guarding solutions to the latest technology. I’ll bet right now there’s a lot of chatter going on out there about the pros and cons of what’s just been said. Why don’t you offer some of those opinions in the space provided below?

   Let’s look at the second thought for a moment – My shop is safe because we haven’t had an accident for umpteen years! How many of you think these folks are right? I hope most of you disagree with this opinion. It may be a correct fact that a company may not have had an accident for umpteen years. But, this fact alone in no way substantiates that their shop is safe. Again, what is it that these folks don’t see or understand?

   In my opinion, you need to ask several more questions to answer this question. I’ll suggest just a few.

1.    Does this company have an effective safety culture?

2.    Does this company have an effective and accountable safety program?

3.    Do machine operators feel free to stop the machine over safety issues?

4.    Does top management take a proactive role in machine safety oversight?

5.    Have updated current risk assessments been completed for all machinery?

   This is just the tip of the iceberg. As you know, there’s a lot more to this equation. However, the point is that if you can answer yes to all these questions then it’s only possible to say that your shop has had an accident free track record but not necessarily because the shop is safe. In forty five plus years I haven’t seen a safe shop yet.

   So, does any company have to upgrade to the latest technology for machine guarding? I would offer that there is no mandate. However, I do see many companies choosing to upgrade to the latest machine safety guarding because the solutions today offer potential significant cost avoidance and/or cost savings opportunities. In today’s competitive cost conscience environment – how could any company not consider the opportunities offered from some of these recent innovative machine safety solutions?

   What opinions, questions, or experiences can you add to this discussion?

   Your comments or suggestion are always welcome so please let us know your thoughts. Submit your ideas, experiences, and challenges on this subject in the comments section below. Click on the following text if you don't see a comments box, then scroll down: I Don’t Have To Upgrade My Machine Safety To The Latest Technology.

   Did you see the Safety Integration Webcast?

   Related articles:

We’re safe; we’ve had no machine safety accidents for a long time

Risk assessment - A best practice for sustainable performance

Designing In Machine Guarding

Machine safety pays off

Contact: www.jbtitus.com for “Solutions for Machine Safety”.



No comments
The Engineers' Choice Awards highlight some of the best new control, instrumentation and automation products as chosen by...
Each year, a panel of Control Engineering editors and industry expert judges select the System Integrator of the Year Award winners.
Control Engineering Leaders Under 40 identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
Learn more about methods used to ensure that the integration between the safety system and the process control...
Adding industrial toughness and reliability to Ethernet eGuide
Technological advances like multiple-in-multiple-out (MIMO) transmitting and receiving
Virtualization advice: 4 ways splitting servers can help manufacturing; Efficient motion controls; Fill the brain drain; Learn from the HART Plant of the Year
Two sides to process safety: Combining human and technical factors in your program; Preparing HMI graphics for migrations; Mechatronics and safety; Engineers' Choice Awards
Detecting security breaches: Forensic invenstigations depend on knowing your networks inside and out; Wireless workers; Opening robotic control; Product exclusive: Robust encoders
The Ask Control Engineering blog covers all aspects of automation, including motors, drives, sensors, motion control, machine control, and embedded systems.
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
News and comments from Control Engineering process industries editor, Peter Welander.
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
This is a blog from the trenches – written by engineers who are implementing and upgrading control systems every day across every industry.
Anthony Baker is a fictitious aggregation of experts from Callisto Integration, providing manufacturing consulting and systems integration.
Integrator Guide

Integrator Guide

Search the online Automation Integrator Guide
 

Create New Listing

Visit the System Integrators page to view past winners of Control Engineering's System Integrator of the Year Award and learn how to enter the competition. You will also find more information on system integrators and Control System Integrators Association.

Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Control Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.