Inside the competition for the first PLC

The race to develop the first programmable logic controllers was underway inside General Motors’ Hydra-Matic Transmission Division in Ypsilanti, Michigan, in 1970. Three finalists had very different architectures.


In April of 1968, a young Hydra-Matic engineer, Dave Emmett, proposed the development of what he called a “Standard Machine Controller.” The controller he envisioned would replace the relay systems that controlled machine operations. Courtesy: RedVikingIn 1970, a fierce contest was being waged inside General Motors' Hydra-Matic Transmission Division in Ypsilanti, Michigan. At stake was program ownership of what would become the first programmable logic controllers (PLCs), and the outcome would shape not only the design of the first PLCs, but also the success or failure of their advocates.

PLC incubator

It was natural that GM's premier manufacturing technology group, Hydra-Matic, would be the incubator of the PLC. A nationally recognized technology leader, Hydra-Matic had installed one of the early IBM 1800 computers, the IBM 1801.

Richard Lundy, an owner of one of the original PLC suppliers, tells the story of when Ed O'Connell, a Computer Group engineer, didn't think GM was getting enough support from IBM. "An entire test line was running off of the one computer," Lundy said, "which made it very vulnerable, and Ed didn't like the support he was getting. So he called Watson." That's Thomas Watson, Jr., the son of IBM's founder and company CEO. Support for Hydra-Matic's IBM system quickly improved. 

Fuel: Hydra-Matic internal competition

In April of 1968, a young Hydra-Matic engineer, Dave Emmett, proposed the development of what he called a "Standard Machine Controller." The controller he envisioned would replace the relay systems that controlled machine operations. Emmett was in charge of the Circuitry Group, and he envisioned a machine that would reduce maintenance costs, improve machine diagnostics, and decrease panel space.

Randy Brodzik, who later worked for Emmett, remembers that Emmett had a clear vision of what was needed: "Dave said the goal was to develop a technology that would significantly reduce the time it took to make changes to a machine control sequence. With relays, first you had to do all the documentation, and then change all the wiring. It would take hours."

The RFP for what would become the first PLC, issued in June 1968, included only four pages of design specifications, including a requirement that “memory word length shall be at least eight bits.” Douglas Brant worked on specifications for equipment cominAt about the same time, another group in Hydra-Matic was envisioning a different type of machine control system for GM. The Computer Division had hired Information Instruments, Inc. (3-I) to create a computer controlled assembly machine for the forward clutch line. This new control system had no limits to the number of elements in a ladder diagram, included parallel processing, and could incorporate complex Boolean equations.

Richard Lundy, a program manager for 3-I at the time, said the competition between the two Hydra-Matic Groups was "pretty dramatic." He described the Circuitry Group as wanting to duplicate existing ladder diagrams, while the Computer Group wanted to use nonsequential programming, similar to that used in current end-of-line test systems, to provide a more robust instruction set and reduce processing time. The advantages and limitations of each approach would become clear as the project progressed. 

3 finalists, different architectures

In April and May of 1968, work was done on a request for proposal that is remarkably simple by today's standards. The RFP, issued in June 1968, included only four pages of design specifications, including a requirement that "memory word length shall be at least eight bits." Douglas Brant worked on specifications for equipment coming into Hydra-Matic. He said that there was a strong rivalry between the Computer Group and the Circuitry Group in developing the specifications. "I guess it boiled down to people's territory," Brant said.

Of the many companies who received the RFP, three were selected for evaluation: Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC), 3-I, and Bedford Associates, a consulting firm. Its products were the DEC PDP-14, the 3-I PDQ-II, and Bedford Associates' Modicon 084. (The Modicon name came from MOdular DIgital CONtroller.)

In the quest to respond to GM Hydra-Matic’s design requirements for what became the PLC, competition was intense among the vendors as well as their Hydra-Matic advocates. Three controllers were evaluated for two years and on June 3, 1970, the design consiIn June of 1969, DEC's PDP-14 was installed to control a gear grinder. Richard Lundy says that in spite of a very strong GM-DEC relationship, DEC's concerns about memory failure significantly limited the PDP-14's competitiveness. To make a change to the DEC program, "you had to send the client program in to them, and they would send you back a hardwired memory board," Lundy said. Having to remove a controller's memory from the plant to make changes would prove to make the DEC option unsustainable. 

2 Hydra-Matic Groups, alliances

Richard Lundy's company, 3-I, was aligned with the Hydra-Matic Computer Group. Lundy said that during the evaluation period, the rivalry between the Computer Group and the Circuitry Group escalated. To the Computer Group, the advantages of higher level logic capabilities were clear and the selection of the PDQ-II was an obvious one. The 3-I solution for the forward clutch line, with its complex programming, had performed beautifully. Lundy said the PDQ-II quickly became known within the Computer Group as "pretty damn quick."

Emmett and the Circuitry Group advocated strongly for the Modicon 084. The programming that was seen as a benefit by the Computer Group was seen as a detriment by Emmett's team. Because Modicon's programming language was similar to the Group's familiar relay ladder diagrams, it was expected to provide the smoothest transition and lowest cost for training and support. Randy Brodzik recalls that Emmett had an implementation view of the project: "He said that in order for this new technology to achieve wide acceptance, it needed to emulate what was already in place."

As an added bonus for Modicon, the 084 was the only controller built into a hardened package, providing plant floor protection that the other two options did not. 

<< First < Previous 1 2 Next > Last >>

Anonymous , 08/28/14 09:19 AM:

Great article about the birth of the PLC. I always wondered how the name Modicon came about, and now I know.
GAETAN , PA, United States, 08/28/14 10:01 AM:

Excellent article. I have been working with PLCs for years and was not aware od how all this came about.
JERRY , AL, United States, 08/28/14 11:46 AM:

A great look into the past and how it developed. Now, the future, as always, is ahead of us.
RANDOLPH , MI, United States, 09/01/14 05:51 PM:

I worked for Modicon from 1981 - 1984 when the 584 was the big PC (Programmable Controller). I know Dick Morley and remember hearing about the PDP-14, but never heard about the PDQ-II. I remember how the hardened aspect of the 084 was made into a selling point. Incidentally, why are all Modicon controllers an x84 (084, 184, 384, 484, 584, 884 and 984)? I know the answer, does anybody else?
FERNANDO , CA, United States, 09/02/14 02:43 PM:

Anonymous , 09/03/14 07:58 AM:

Great work pulling this article together. It would be a shame for this history to be lost. Pictures of the old controllers are great. Thanks!
ANTHONY , VA, United States, 09/03/14 12:19 PM:

Great article about the origin of the PLC. I was aware that MODICON was the first, but did not know about the competition that brought about its inception.
GUS , AZ, United States, 09/03/14 07:43 PM:

Have worked with Modicon PLCs forever, I never new how "Modicon" came about. Great birth of industry article.
By the way is 084 related to 4nodes and 8 bits? Randolph?
DENNIS , Non-US/Not Applicable, United Kingdom, 09/04/14 03:44 AM:

Great article, I took the phone off the hook to make sure I could read it all undisturbed. My involvement with PLC's started in the 80's after expieriencing production control via a PDP 11 and Intel 8080 & 8085 sub controllers. These "New" PLC's were a god send in comparison and I have been involved with them right up to today, two weeks off my 61st birthday.
Thanks for taking me back ! !
James , IN, United States, 09/04/14 08:06 AM:

PDQ II by Allen Bradley, was used in Indy on a Hot Dog smoke house in '72.
Program near statement list, loaded into a mylar punched tape loader. Processor was removed, loaded, verified, and processor re-installed in rack.
The Engineers' Choice Awards highlight some of the best new control, instrumentation and automation products as chosen by...
The System Integrator Giants program lists the top 100 system integrators among companies listed in CFE Media's Global System Integrator Database.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
This eGuide illustrates solutions, applications and benefits of machine vision systems.
Learn how to increase device reliability in harsh environments and decrease unplanned system downtime.
This eGuide contains a series of articles and videos that considers theoretical and practical; immediate needs and a look into the future.
Choosing controllers: PLCs, PACs, IPCs, DCS? What's best for your application?; Wireless trends; Design, integration; Manufacturing Day; Product Exclusive
Variable speed drives: Smooth, efficient, electrically quite motion control; Process control upgrades; Mobile intelligence; Product finalists: Vote now; Product Exclusives
Machine design tips: Pneumatic or electric; Software upgrades; Ethernet advantages; Additive manufacturing; Engineering Leaders; Product exclusives: PLC, HMI, IO
This article collection contains the 5 most referenced articles on improving the use of PID.
Learn how Industry 4.0 adds supply chain efficiency, optimizes pricing, improves quality, and more.

Find and connect with the most suitable service provider for your unique application. Start searching the Global System Integrator Database Now!

Cyber security cost-efficient for industrial control systems; Extracting full value from operational data; Managing cyber security risks
Drilling for Big Data: Managing the flow of information; Big data drilldown series: Challenge and opportunity; OT to IT: Creating a circle of improvement; Industry loses best workers, again
Pipeline vulnerabilities? Securing hydrocarbon transit; Predictive analytics hit the mainstream; Dirty pipelines decrease flow, production—pig your line; Ensuring pipeline physical and cyber security