Machine Guarding: Tolerable vs residual risk

Why do so many colleagues in manufacturing choose to avoid the terms – tolerable risk and residual risk? If there’s one thing “integrated safety systems” and requirements for risk assessments have brought to the industrial forefront over the past ten years – it’s risk awareness. It’s now “OK” in conversation and correspondence within companies to use words like; risk, safety, mitigation, hazard, and consequences – all in one paragraph.

11/11/2011


JB Titus, CFSEWhy do so many colleagues in manufacturing choose to avoid the terms – tolerable risk and residual risk? If there’s one thing “integrated safety systems” and requirements for risk assessments have brought to the industrial forefront over the past ten years – it’s risk awareness. It’s now “OK” in conversation and correspondence within companies to use words like; risk, safety, mitigation, hazard, and consequences – all in one paragraph.

    So, is there any difference between “tolerable risk” and “residual risk”?

    In my opinion, yes! First, let’s start with residual risk. Residual risk is defined by ANSI B11 – 2008 (General Safety Requirements Common to ANSI B11 Machines) as; “risk remaining after protective measures (risk reduction measures) have been taken”. Furthermore, a commonly understood fact is that there will always be some level of residual risk for a given hazard after all risk reduction measures have been applied. In other words, residual risk will never equal zero. Let’s draw this machine safety an analogy with everyday life. Almost daily we get into our automobile and drive some distance to go to the store, work, school, etc. and we have experienced the residual risk associated with this experience. Many risk reduction measures have been applied by; the automobile manufacturer, the State Department of Transportation, the highway developer, the licensing department, etc. and the local police department is the enforcement agency. Therefore, everyone in the automobile has understood the residual risk associated with this experience acknowledging that there still is some risk which means it cannot equal zero.

    Now, what is tolerable risk? Tolerable risk is defined by ANSI B11 – 2008 as; “risk that is accepted for a given task (hazard situation) or hazard. For the purpose of this standard the terms “acceptable risk” and “tolerable risk” are synonymous”. The standard goes on to say that; “The expression “acceptable risk” refers to the level at which further risk reduction will not result in significant reduction of risk; or additional expenditure of resources will not result in significant advantages of increased safety”. In my opinion, this definition means that all risk reduction measures have been taken to mitigate the given hazard in order to reduce the risk to a tolerable risk level. My experience is that various companies define tolerable risk levels which are indigenous to; their industry, their business model, the individual hazard, the competency level of employees they are able to hire, the level of local enforcement, and so forth. It’s sort of like the difference in driving a car in Lexington, Kentucky versus Mumbai, India. I would very likely define my level of tolerable risk very differently in Mumbai to the point that I probably would not even attempt to drive an automobile.

     Now, is it possible that residual risk and tolerable risk may equal the same level? Of course! However, they are very different in my opinion because of different definitions and because their approaches are very different.

    What is your opinion?

    Your comments or suggestion are always welcome so please let us know your thoughts. Submit your ideas, experiences, and challenges on this subject in the comments section below. Click on the following text if you don't see a comments box, then scroll down: Machine Guarding: Tolerable vs residual risk.

    Related articles:

Residual Risk Is Alive & Ever Present

Machine safety pays off

Contact: www.jbtitus.com for “Solutions for Machine Safety”.



The Engineers' Choice Awards highlight some of the best new control, instrumentation and automation products as chosen by...
The System Integrator Giants program lists the top 100 system integrators among companies listed in CFE Media's Global System Integrator Database.
Each year, a panel of Control Engineering and Plant Engineering editors and industry expert judges select the System Integrator of the Year Award winners in three categories.
This eGuide illustrates solutions, applications and benefits of machine vision systems.
Learn how to increase device reliability in harsh environments and decrease unplanned system downtime.
This eGuide contains a series of articles and videos that considers theoretical and practical; immediate needs and a look into the future.
Robotic integration and cloud connections; SCADA and cybersecurity; Motor efficiency standards; Open- and closed-loop control; Augmented reality
Controller programming; Safety networks; Enclosure design; Power quality; Safety integrity levels; Increasing process efficiency
Additive manufacturing benefits; HMI and sensor tips; System integrator advice; Innovations from the industry
Featured articles highlight technologies that enable the Industrial Internet of Things, IIoT-related products and strategies to get data more easily to the user.
This article collection contains several articles on how automation and controls are helping human-machine interface (HMI) hardware and software advance.
This digital report will explore several aspects of how IIoT will transform manufacturing in the coming years.

Find and connect with the most suitable service provider for your unique application. Start searching the Global System Integrator Database Now!

Cloud, mobility, and remote operations; SCADA and contextual mobility; Custom UPS empowering a secure pipeline
Infrastructure for natural gas expansion; Artificial lift methods; Disruptive technology and fugitive gas emissions
Mobility as the means to offshore innovation; Preventing another Deepwater Horizon; ROVs as subsea robots; SCADA and the radio spectrum
Automation Engineer; Wood Group
System Integrator; Cross Integrated Systems Group
Jose S. Vasquez, Jr.
Fire & Life Safety Engineer; Technip USA Inc.
This course focuses on climate analysis, appropriateness of cooling system selection, and combining cooling systems.
This course will help identify and reveal electrical hazards and identify the solutions to implementing and maintaining a safe work environment.
This course explains how maintaining power and communication systems through emergency power-generation systems is critical.
click me