Molecular fishing: New chemical sensing method described at Duke

New devices could quickly sense chemical concentration, and switch chemicals by switching out a chip, suggest Duke University researchers Eric Toone, Rob Clark, and Piotr Marszalek (left to right).

Durham, NC —A new molecular “fishing” technique developed by researchers at Duke University and Duke’s Pratt School of Engineering lays the groundwork for future advances in handheld chemical sensing devices, using an atomic force microscope (AFM). Hand-held devices used for medical testing or environmental and food-safety monitoring could quickly and precisely measure concentrations of virtually any chemical substance, including blood proteins, toxic pollutants and dangerous biological agents, in a test solution, according to the researchers.

The researchers describe the chemical methodology that would enable such devices in this week’s online early edition of the journal “Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,” according to a statement from Duke University. The work was supported, in part, by the National Institutes of Health.

The new technique uses an atomic force microscope (AFM), a device for observing the surface of individual molecules and measuring the force of interactions among them. The AFM includes a tiny cantilever arm with a sharp tip that scans the surface of atomic specimens, and monitoring the deflection of the cantilever provides information about the force of molecular interactions.

The researchers’ AFM method of chemical sensing:

Could be adapted for virtually any chemical by varying the identity of the molecular “bait” and “fish;”

Could be incorporated into devices similar to handheld personal digital assistants that could test different chemicals by switching out a chip; and

Has advantages over other testing methods that rely on heat or changes in optical properties.

The researchers use the AFM’s cantilever as a fishing rod, which they bait with a sample of the chemical to be measured. The proteins known to bind the target chemical are the fish. The chemical “worm” is dipped into a solution that contains the target chemical and the protein. “Because the fish are easier to catch with the baited cantilever when there are fewer free worms to compete with, the researchers can quantify the amount of chemical in solution by tallying the number of successful catches,” the university explains.

“As you sample the surface with the AFM cantilever fishing rod, the number of times you get a ‘bite’ provides a measure of the chemical concentration,” said chemistry professor Eric Toone of Duke University. The team also included mechanical engineering and materials science professors Rob Clark and Piotr Marszalek, both of Duke’s Pratt School. All three investigators are members of Duke’s Center for Biologically Inspired Materials.

While the current process requires about 200 pulls on the cantilever rod and takes hours to provide an accurate reading, it could be made much faster in a very straightforward way, the researchers said. “To get enough pulls, you can either pull one rod 200 times or pull 200 rods once,” Clark said. “The test could be made massively parallel and very fast.” In demonstrating the new method using lactose molecules as the worms and a protein called galectin 3 as the fish, the researchers relied on computerized AFM controls to lower the baited cantilever toward the solution a billionth of a meter at a time.

“Instead of plunging into the surface, we approached it step by step to minimize the number of interactions to one, maybe two, molecules,” Marszalek said.

Based on the force measured on the AFM rod as it was withdrawn from the solution, the researchers judged each attempt as nonbinding, meaning they didn’t catch anything or made only passing contact, or as binding. When galectin 3 fish bound the lactose bait, withdrawal of the cantilever registered a greater force. They repeated the process until the bait had made some form of contact at least 350 times. They found, as expected, that the probability of binding varied with the concentration of lactose in the solution. At low concentrations, binding occurred with the greatest frequency. As the concentration rose, the likelihood of binding declined. The researchers used that probability of binding to calculate the chemical concentration.

Although broadly applicable, techniques that rely on heat or changes in optical properties “require long sampling times and equipment that isn’t suitable for use in the field,” Toone said. Additionally, methods that depend on optical characteristics generally require the testing solution to be clear, precluding their use on blood, milk, or any other opaque solution. The researchers said they will continue to examine the fundamental biophysics behind the new method and develop practical applications.

Collaborators on the study included Phillip Snyder and Gwangrog Lee, who recently completed doctorate degrees at Duke in chemistry and mechanical engineering, respectively.

—Control Engineering Daily News DeskEdited by Mark T. Hoske , editor in chief

Do you have experience and expertise with the topics mentioned in this content? You should consider contributing to our CFE Media editorial team and getting the recognition you and your company deserve. Click here to start this process.