Money for nothing: Consider replacing DCS now

Orlando, FL—There’s no such thing as a free lunch? Oh, but there is, if you consider savings that can add up and pay for investments in aging distributed control system infrastructure, according to a Rockwell Automation control technology replacement expert.

07/31/2007


Orlando, FL —There’s no such thing as a free lunch? Oh, but there is, if you consider savings that can add up and pay for investments in aging distributed control system infrastructure, according to a Rockwell Automation control technology replacement expert. And while performing in-kind replacements, as needed and piece by piece, is certainly an option, costs are higher and the savings aren’t as great.

“We need to think harder about how we can migrate customers from legacy distributed control systems to today’s systems,” says Mike Vernak, program manager for Rockwell Automation’s legacy DCS migration solutions program. Reasons for delaying upgrades include unwillingness to shut down production, lack of capital budgets, and an apparent willingness to spend the dollars on maintenance, he says. Vernak told Control Engineering at the company’s recent RSTechEd conference that, in his more than 20 years in process industries, he has seen similar challenges everywhere.

“I ask people how things are operating, what keeps them up at night, and what are the risks associated with unplanned downtime,” Vernak explains. Sometimes one lost batch can cost millions of dollars. Also part of the conversation are benefits that can accrue from update systems, such as the latest PC-based controllers, advanced human-machine interfaces, faster information about the process, tighter loop control, and use of advanced algorithms. Upgrades also provide the opportunity to redesign processes more efficiently, and phase a migration, if that’s needed. He said sometimes one unit will get a new DCS, and the removed equipment becomes a parts store for remaining units until capital is available to migrate the rest of the plant.

At the request of Control Engineering , Vernak assembled the table, “Legacy DCS migration cost justification,” to compare some costs of direct part replacement versus purchasing a new system. As if the 10-fold difference in replacement costs weren’t convincing enough, supporting reasons (such as lack of technical support, difficulty in finding parts, and data flow and translation challenges) help make project justification easier. See the table for more.

Direct replacement
(In-kind parts)

New peplacement
(New Microsoft-based PC)

Reasons to replace

Console replacement,

Hardware (HW) & software (SW) licenses


$50K+


$5K+

 

  • •Unsupported HW/SW

  • Difficult to find spare parts

  • Costly to replace/repair

  • Difficult to get data to/from

  • Lack of technical support

Controller replacement
(HW & tag licences)


$20– 40K


$5– 15K

 

  • •Unsupported HW/SW

  • Difficult to find spare parts

  • Costly to replace/repair

  • Difficult to get data to/from

  • Does not support advanced process control, MPC, fuzzy logic

  • Lack of technical support

I/O Replacement
(HW only)


$1K+ per IOM


$400+ per IOM

 

  • •Unsupported HW

  • Difficult to find spare parts

  • Costly to replace/repair

  • Not well distributed (marshalled)

  • Lacks diagnostics

  • Does not support digital I/O (FFB, DNET)

  • •Lack of technical support

Networks

$50K+

$10K+

 

  • Proprietary (No COTS HW available)

  • Unsupported HW

  • Difficult to find spare parts

  • Costly to replace/repair

  • Difficult to communicate to "open" systems

  • •Lack of technical support

Source: Control Engineering with information from Rockwell Automation

Rockwell Automation has a three-step DSC migration program .

For other news from the RSTechEd meeting in June, see:
Software upgrades: Rockwell CPR 9 to ship in October
Convergence of IT, controls delivers benefits
Re-target your innovations

Mark T. Hoske , Control Engineering editor in chief





No comments
The Engineers' Choice Awards highlight some of the best new control, instrumentation and automation products as chosen by...
Each year, a panel of Control Engineering editors and industry expert judges select the System Integrator of the Year Award winners.
Control Engineering Leaders Under 40 identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
Learn more about methods used to ensure that the integration between the safety system and the process control...
Adding industrial toughness and reliability to Ethernet eGuide
Technological advances like multiple-in-multiple-out (MIMO) transmitting and receiving
Virtualization advice: 4 ways splitting servers can help manufacturing; Efficient motion controls; Fill the brain drain; Learn from the HART Plant of the Year
Two sides to process safety: Combining human and technical factors in your program; Preparing HMI graphics for migrations; Mechatronics and safety; Engineers' Choice Awards
Detecting security breaches: Forensic invenstigations depend on knowing your networks inside and out; Wireless workers; Opening robotic control; Product exclusive: Robust encoders
The Ask Control Engineering blog covers all aspects of automation, including motors, drives, sensors, motion control, machine control, and embedded systems.
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
News and comments from Control Engineering process industries editor, Peter Welander.
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
This is a blog from the trenches – written by engineers who are implementing and upgrading control systems every day across every industry.
Anthony Baker is a fictitious aggregation of experts from Callisto Integration, providing manufacturing consulting and systems integration.
Integrator Guide

Integrator Guide

Search the online Automation Integrator Guide
 

Create New Listing

Visit the System Integrators page to view past winners of Control Engineering's System Integrator of the Year Award and learn how to enter the competition. You will also find more information on system integrators and Control System Integrators Association.

Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Control Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.