More Standards are Coming: What you need to Know


The British are coming. So, too, are the Germans and French, with the standards relating to machine and system safety. The new standards, EN62061 and EN ISO 13849-1, signal the advent of the Performance Level (PL), a risk-based assessment that categorizes machine but not process safety. The transition to the new standards will take place over the next two years.

For those original equipment manufacturers exporting to Europe, the changes are important immediately, but the new standards are likely to impact everyone involved in machine safety. For one thing, there are global end users with a worldwide reach, companies with plants around the globe. They don’t like standards divergence and they do like standards harmony. For another, the same can be said for governing bodies in North America or elsewhere. So some version of the new safety standards will probably be adopted worldwide.

That may be some time off but global end users could hasten the de facto adoption of the safety requirements through their suppliers. These vendors sell to others as well, and so market forces may lead to a more rapid implementation of the standards than the pace dictated by standards groups.

As for what’s in the new standards, one of the biggest changes is the replacement of machine safety categories with PLs. The former are determined by a series of yes/no questions, leading to a pegging of a machine as a category 2 or 3 and so on. Problems with this approach are that the answer depends upon who’s asking the question, which makes it difficult to always come up with the same final determination. Another issue is that categories have no relationship to SIL, which is used by manufacturers running a process. Thus there’s no way to answer the question about what’s the SIL rating of a category 2 machine.

The new standards solve these problems by getting rid of categories in favor of Performance Levels that run from a to e. The severity of injury, the frequency and/or duration of exposure, and the possibility of prevention all play a part in determining the PL, in a manner analogous to the way similar variables play a role in finding SIL. By going to PLs, the variability in assessing machine safety is minimized and so the same result can be arrived at by the machine’s maker and its end user. With PLs, it’s also easier for machine makers and machine users to talk to one another since it is possible to translate from SIL to PL and vice versa. So those companies running a process can talk in a quantitative way about safety with those making the processing machines in terms that both can understand– with a bit of translation.

When the widespread adoption of this new way of looking at machine safety might happen isn’t yet known. The transition clearly won’t take place any faster than the one in Europe, which is already underway and due to wrap up by 2009. Past experience suggests it will be some time after that before the new standards will be adopted elsewhere. The gating factor could be the production and adoption cycle of North American standards. If that’s the case, then the maximum time before the new safety approach makes it appearance will be a few years past 2009.

If you would like to learn more about these standards and how they may affect you, Siemens is hosting a series of educational webcasts covering a host of Machine Safety, Risk Assessment and international standards topics. click here to learn more.

No comments
The Engineers' Choice Awards highlight some of the best new control, instrumentation and automation products as chosen by...
The System Integrator Giants program lists the top 100 system integrators among companies listed in CFE Media's Global System Integrator Database.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
This eGuide illustrates solutions, applications and benefits of machine vision systems.
Learn how to increase device reliability in harsh environments and decrease unplanned system downtime.
This eGuide contains a series of articles and videos that considers theoretical and practical; immediate needs and a look into the future.
Robotic safety, collaboration, standards; DCS migration tips; IT/OT convergence; 2017 Control Engineering Salary and Career Survey
Integrated mobility; Artificial intelligence; Predictive motion control; Sensors and control system inputs; Asset Management; Cybersecurity
Big Data and IIoT value; Monitoring Big Data; Robotics safety standards and programming; Learning about PID
Featured articles highlight technologies that enable the Industrial Internet of Things, IIoT-related products and strategies to get data more easily to the user.
This article collection contains several articles on how automation and controls are helping human-machine interface (HMI) hardware and software advance.
This digital report will explore several aspects of how IIoT will transform manufacturing in the coming years.

Find and connect with the most suitable service provider for your unique application. Start searching the Global System Integrator Database Now!

Mobility as the means to offshore innovation; Preventing another Deepwater Horizon; ROVs as subsea robots; SCADA and the radio spectrum
Future of oil and gas projects; Reservoir models; The importance of SCADA to oil and gas
Big Data and bigger solutions; Tablet technologies; SCADA developments
Automation Engineer; Wood Group
System Integrator; Cross Integrated Systems Group
Jose S. Vasquez, Jr.
Fire & Life Safety Engineer; Technip USA Inc.
This course focuses on climate analysis, appropriateness of cooling system selection, and combining cooling systems.
This course will help identify and reveal electrical hazards and identify the solutions to implementing and maintaining a safe work environment.
This course explains how maintaining power and communication systems through emergency power-generation systems is critical.
click me