Protecting Against Arc Flash Hazard at a Gas Processing Plant

04/23/2007


Shell Canada faced a variety of arc flash challenges at its Burnt Timber gas processing plant—most importantly, employee safety. Shell’s search and ultimate success in finding a solution to its arc flash challenges began with a request for a short circuit, coordination and arc flash study at the facility. The company from which they sought this assistance ended up stepping in and providing a comprehensive management solution to update Shell’s equipment to meet and exceed the safety standards.

They performed a comprehensive analysis of the facility, which showed that most of the plant was at a category 4 or higher arc flash level, as defined by the electrical safety standard NFPA 70E. The industry will generally accept up to Class 4 arc flash levels with the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE). Since Shell had already developed a safety standard (barely into Class 3) based on NFPA 70E, engineers went to work to determine the best way to achieve Shell’s desired safety standards throughout the plant.

Shell’s solution was a comprehensive program to install an arc flash reduction maintenance system and retrofit conversion packages to existing equipment. The unit lowers arc flash incident energy levels by temporarily lowering trip settings during the maintenance cycle.

Service engineers began by installing an arc flash reduction maintenance system unit/conversion kit on the Burnt Timber facility’s main power distribution breaker (an existing Westinghouse DS complete with Amptector trips). This brought the 480-volt system to an acceptable arc flash safety level (category 1). The scope of the project grew when a second generator breaker (due for replacement in 2007) was also scheduled for Class 2 reconditioning (local/field repair).

During the reconditioning of the first two breakers, service field engineers also discovered that other breakers in the facility required a full Class 1 reconditioning (factory rebuild equivalent), and work is progressing on this project, too, saving Shell from potential future problems.

Due to Shell’s gas processing demands, two breakers were reconditioned on-site to a modified Class 2 level and will be elevated to Class 1 based on scheduled downtime at a later date. Two other units were shipped to the Edmonton Breaker Center where they underwent reconditioning to Class 1 levels. To date, the service engineers have completed installation of arc flash reduction maintenance system units on all six DS breakers at the facility. This solution will allow for the future safe removal of motor control center buckets without the need to power the system offline, and all the MCC buckets will be retrofitted over a two-year period.

As a result, Shell ordered 15 conversion kits with the arc flash reduction maintenance system and Class 2 reconditioning for its Scotford facility. Service engineers installed the units within a two-week period, against an extremely tight schedule. The units are easy to install on existing breakers, and as many as two to three breakers can be field-modified each day, minimizing downtime.
“Overall, the project exceeded our expectations,” said Jay Baxter, from the Shell Scotford facility. “We have committed to have 15 additional units installed to complete one section of the facility. The engineers have also recommended that similar work be performed in the remainder of the plant %%MDASSML%%which would involve 45 additional units. These changes mean we’ll have a safer work environment for our employees. And, we couldn’t have done it without Eaton’s arc flash expertise.”

For more information about PowerChain management solutions from Eaton , click here.





No comments
The Engineers' Choice Awards highlight some of the best new control, instrumentation and automation products as chosen by...
Each year, a panel of Control Engineering editors and industry expert judges select the System Integrator of the Year Award winners.
Control Engineering Leaders Under 40 identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
Learn more about methods used to ensure that the integration between the safety system and the process control...
Adding industrial toughness and reliability to Ethernet eGuide
Technological advances like multiple-in-multiple-out (MIMO) transmitting and receiving
Virtualization advice: 4 ways splitting servers can help manufacturing; Efficient motion controls; Fill the brain drain; Learn from the HART Plant of the Year
Two sides to process safety: Combining human and technical factors in your program; Preparing HMI graphics for migrations; Mechatronics and safety; Engineers' Choice Awards
Detecting security breaches: Forensic invenstigations depend on knowing your networks inside and out; Wireless workers; Opening robotic control; Product exclusive: Robust encoders
The Ask Control Engineering blog covers all aspects of automation, including motors, drives, sensors, motion control, machine control, and embedded systems.
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
News and comments from Control Engineering process industries editor, Peter Welander.
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
This is a blog from the trenches – written by engineers who are implementing and upgrading control systems every day across every industry.
Anthony Baker is a fictitious aggregation of experts from Callisto Integration, providing manufacturing consulting and systems integration.
Integrator Guide

Integrator Guide

Search the online Automation Integrator Guide
 

Create New Listing

Visit the System Integrators page to view past winners of Control Engineering's System Integrator of the Year Award and learn how to enter the competition. You will also find more information on system integrators and Control System Integrators Association.

Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Control Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.