Proximity sensor implementation

Inductive proximity sensors have a set of standard behaviors. Understanding these behaviors enhances implementation while avoiding pitfalls typically associated with these sensors.Inductive proximity sensors generate a magnetic field from their detection faces. Whenever a detectable object moves into the sensor's field of detection, Eddy currents build up in the target and dampen the sens...

02/01/2001


Inductive proximity sensors have a set of standard behaviors. Understanding these behaviors enhances implementation while avoiding pitfalls typically associated with these sensors.

Inductive proximity sensors generate a magnetic field from their detection faces. Whenever a detectable object moves into the sensor's field of detection, Eddy currents build up in the target and dampen the sensor's magnetic field. This effect triggers the sensor's output. Since a current in the target is needed for detection, inductive proximity sensors are uniquely suited for detection of all types of metals.

These sensors come in two forms, shielded and unshielded. A shielded inductive proximity sensor can be embedded flush in its mounting material without affecting the sensor's field of detection. The unshielded inductive proximity sensor has the advantage of longer sensing distances, but the disadvantage of not being embeddable.



A standard 30mm diameter inductive proximity sensor has a
10mm sensing distance. The above chart shows the
reduction in sensing distance due to different types of materials

Understand sensing distance

When an inductive proximity sensor is rated for sensing distance, the rating refers to the sensor's ability to detect the 'standard detectable object' at its specified sensing distance. The 'standard detectable object' is a 1-mm thick, square piece of ferrous metal, with the side of the square equal to the diameter of the proximity sensor's face.

If the target material is not ferrous, the effective sensing distance of the sensor will be different. Here are a few examples of the reduction in sensing distance due to target material. Copper is 30% of the effective sensing distance, aluminum is 40%, brass is 50%, and stainless steel is 80%.

Other factors that can account for reduced sensing distances are the target material's capacity for conductance. Conductive materials disperse the Eddy currents that are required for inductive sensing. Highly conductive materials make poor detectable objects and create reduced sensing distances. On the other hand, thin materials, for example aluminum foil, hold the Eddy currents and make excellent targets for inductive sensing.

Lastly, make sure that the specified power requirements are met. Reduced line voltages can lead to weak magnetic fields from the sensor's detection face and smaller sensing distances.

Output chatter

Inductive proximity sensors are designed to have a type of hysteresis in their circuitry that is used to eliminate output chattering. As a target approaches the sensor's detection face, it eventually triggers a sensor output. When the target moves away from the sensor's detection face, the triggered output holds until a certain distance has been passed.

This distance, called the 'reset distance' or 'distance differential,' can be as high as 10% of the sensor's total sensing distance. This holds proportionally true for detection objects that cause reduced sensing distances. Make sure that the target object is completely removed beyond the sensor's reset distance to avoid all potential chattering from detectable object vibrations or other environmental factors.

When using a multitude of inductive proximity sensors in an application, be aware of an effect called mutual interference. This occurs when one proximity sensor's magnetic field effects another sensor's magnetic field causing it to trigger an output. This false triggering can be erratic and difficult to detect.

Look for inductive proximity sensors that feature alternate frequency models. These alternate frequency sensors oscillate their magnetic fields in different frequencies and do not interfere with one another as much as two inductive proximity sensors with the same frequency. Simply take one frequency proximity sensor and mount it next to one of a different frequency.

Inductive proximity sensors are a simple and effective sensing tool. Avoid application problems by planned implementations, and your applications will be a success.

For more information, visit www.info.omron.com


Author Information

Guerrino Suffi, proximity sensors product marketing specialist, Omron Electronics Inc. (Schaumburg, Ill.).




No comments
The Engineers' Choice Awards highlight some of the best new control, instrumentation and automation products as chosen by...
Each year, a panel of Control Engineering editors and industry expert judges select the System Integrator of the Year Award winners.
Control Engineering Leaders Under 40 identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
Learn more about methods used to ensure that the integration between the safety system and the process control...
Adding industrial toughness and reliability to Ethernet eGuide
Technological advances like multiple-in-multiple-out (MIMO) transmitting and receiving
Virtualization advice: 4 ways splitting servers can help manufacturing; Efficient motion controls; Fill the brain drain; Learn from the HART Plant of the Year
Two sides to process safety: Combining human and technical factors in your program; Preparing HMI graphics for migrations; Mechatronics and safety; Engineers' Choice Awards
Detecting security breaches: Forensic invenstigations depend on knowing your networks inside and out; Wireless workers; Opening robotic control; Product exclusive: Robust encoders
The Ask Control Engineering blog covers all aspects of automation, including motors, drives, sensors, motion control, machine control, and embedded systems.
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
News and comments from Control Engineering process industries editor, Peter Welander.
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
This is a blog from the trenches – written by engineers who are implementing and upgrading control systems every day across every industry.
Anthony Baker is a fictitious aggregation of experts from Callisto Integration, providing manufacturing consulting and systems integration.
Integrator Guide

Integrator Guide

Search the online Automation Integrator Guide
 

Create New Listing

Visit the System Integrators page to view past winners of Control Engineering's System Integrator of the Year Award and learn how to enter the competition. You will also find more information on system integrators and Control System Integrators Association.

Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Control Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.