Robust reliability and maintainability process reduces costs

A more robust and understood reliability and maintainability process can reduce costs and improve competitiveness in companies of all types. With only 38% of companies doing business using RandM specifications, it’s a good indication of how much these methodologies are actually being used. As shown in Fig.

07/01/2009


A more robust and understood reliability and maintainability process can reduce costs and improve competitiveness in companies of all types. With only 38% of companies doing business using RandM specifications, it’s a good indication of how much these methodologies are actually being used. As shown in Fig. 1, increasing levels of RandM resulted in lower maintenance expenditures. Each point represents the average for all North American companies that responded in that RandM level.

Also, North American companies that had more production operator PM involvement had reduced maintenance costs. Each point in Fig. 2 represents the average for all North American companies that responded in that level of production operator PM involvement.

Changes are coming

All of the company responses were categorized into the six most frequently mentioned areas. The five most representative items for each of the six R and M areas was also compiled.

People and cultural improvements (26%)

  • Improve the culture (management, operator, maintenance)

  • More production operator involvement

  • Hire full-time reliability and maintainability engineers

  • Training (RCM, cross-training, R & M)

  • More involvement by all employees

    • More design-in reliability and maintainability (20%)

      • More design-in reliability and maintainability

      • Standardized components on equipment

      • Standardized controls architecture

      • Component reliability improvements

      • Better use of R & M in decision-making

        • More data-driven processes and tools (19%)

          • Better use of predictive tools

          • Better use of data to drive KPIs

          • Better data on the lifespan of critical components

          • Improve OEE

          • Better integration of SPC and R & M metrics

            • Maintenance process improvements (16%)

              • Implement full TPM process

              • Dedicated resources for R & M tasks

              • Better CMMS use and capability

              • Less reactive maintenance

              • More timely repairs

                • Specific maintenance improvements (13%)

                  • Better inventory/spare parts control

                  • Better lubrication program

                  • More kaizen events

                  • More reliable electrical/electronics

                  • Better system components (i.e., water quality)

                    • Better sensors and timely feedback (6%)

                      • More machine self-monitoring/feedback

                      • More/better error-proofing

                      • Improved sensors and data acquisition

                      • More equipment troubleshooting/diagnostics

                      • More real-time feedback/corrections

                        • Most important maintenance metrics %%MDASSML%% All of the company responses were categorized into the five most frequently mentioned areas. Again, the five most representative items for each of the five metric areas were also compiled.

                          Performance (30%)

                          • MTTR

                          • MTBF

                          • OEE

                            • Critical equipment uptime %, equipment availability %

                              • Maintenance Downtime %

                              • Schedule Compliance (16%)

                              • % PM compliance

                              • % Predictive Maintenance compliance

                              • % PM compliance on critical equipment

                              • % PM work order compliance

                              • % Backlog

                              • Cost (14%)

                              • Maintenance cost/unit produced

                                • Maintenance cost/replacement asset value

                                  • Maintenance cost/sales

                                  • Cost of repairs

                                  • % Budget Compliance

                                    • Maintenance Type (12%)

                                      • % Preventive

                                      • % Predictive

                                      • % Reactive

                                      • Proactive/reactive ratio

                                      • % Corrective repairs from PMs

                                        • Miscellaneous (28%)

                                          • % Lubrication performed

                                          • Pareto analysis of failures, top 10 downtime reasons

                                          • Spare parts usage

                                          • Customer Satisfaction

                                          • Tool Life.

                                            • Additional Findings:

                                              • “Perceived world class’’ maintenance expenditure/original machinery and equipment investment is highest at 12.3% in small companies (less than 100 employees) and lowest in large companies (more than 1,000 employees) at 5.4%

                                              • “Actual” maintenance expenditure/original machinery and equipment investment is highest at 12.5% in small companies (less than 100 employees) and lower in larger companies (7.8% in medium size companies with 101-1000 employees and 8.6% in companies with more than 1000 employees)

                                              • In response to “What has positively impacted maintenance in the last five years?,” large and medium size companies selected “Better management understanding of maintainability/reliability” as the most significant. Small companies selected “More reliable machinery and equipment” as being most helpful

                                              • The largest opportunity was identified as both, “Better technology available” and “More designed-in maintainability” for small companies. Medium and large companies had “More involvement by operators” as their greatest opportunity. Also compared was “Maintenance expenditure/original machinery and equipment investment (%),” for companies that rated the impact of “Better management understanding of maintenance/reliability over the last five years” as high. These companies, on average, performed about 10% better than the 2008 North American average of 9.7% maintenance expenditure/original machinery and equipment investment

                                              • “Production operators performing PM checks or repairs” was 44.7% for small companies, 43.4% for medium size companies and 18.1% for large companies.

                                                • In summary, a robust reliability and maintainability process can result in significant operational improvements and cost reductions.

                                                  A copy of this and additional information can be obtained at the University of Tennessee %%MDASSML%% Reliability and Maintainability Center Website at the end of July by going to www.engr.utk.edu/mrc .





No comments
The Engineers' Choice Awards highlight some of the best new control, instrumentation and automation products as chosen by...
The System Integrator Giants program lists the top 100 system integrators among companies listed in CFE Media's Global System Integrator Database.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
This eGuide illustrates solutions, applications and benefits of machine vision systems.
Learn how to increase device reliability in harsh environments and decrease unplanned system downtime.
This eGuide contains a series of articles and videos that considers theoretical and practical; immediate needs and a look into the future.
System integration: Best practices and technologies to help; Virtualization virtues; Cyber security advice; Motor system efficiency, savings; Product exclusives; Road to Hannover
Collaborative robotics: How to improve safety, return on investment; Industrial Internet of Things, Industrie 4.0: World views; High-performance HMI, Information Integration: OPC and OMG
9 tips: How to integrate a servo system; Process control mathematical models; Serial network grounding; Engineers' Choice Awards; Learn from cyber security mistakes
This article collection contains several articles on the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) and how it is transforming manufacturing.
PLCs, robots, and the quest for a single controller; how OEE is key to automation solutions.
Learn how Industry 4.0 adds supply chain efficiency, optimizes pricing, improves quality, and more.

Find and connect with the most suitable service provider for your unique application. Start searching the Global System Integrator Database Now!

Getting to the bottom of subsea repairs: Older pipelines need more attention, and operators need a repair strategy; OTC preview; Offshore production difficult - and crucial
Digital oilfields: Integrated HMI/SCADA systems enable smarter data acquisition; Real-world impact of simulation; Electric actuator technology prospers in production fields
Special report: U.S. natural gas; LNG transport technologies evolve to meet market demand; Understanding new methane regulations; Predictive maintenance for gas pipeline compressors
click me