Standards, more or less

Do automation, controls, and instrumentation standards serve people or do people serve the standards? A standard is an officially sanctioned way of designing products or processes. A de facto standard is one that so many people use that it is, more or less, a standard without a standards body. Of course, single-company ownership of a de facto standard can boost the bottom line.

01/01/2009


ONLINE extra

-How are standards working, or not working, for you and your organization? Please comment using the tools at the bottom of the page.

- Read more about some of the standards mentioned with links at the bottom of the page.

Do standards serve people or do people serve the standards? A standard is an officially sanctioned way of designing products or processes. A de facto standard is one that so many people use that it is, more or less, a standard without a standards body. Of course, single-company ownership of a de facto standard can boost the bottom line.

Some standards begin in committee, go to a group or organization, then move through a standards body. Others start in a company and are donated, for the greater good, to a governing organization, and progress from there.

Strong feelings accompany standards since they impact ease of use and profits. Local or regional standards can encourage or discourage business. A company choosing not to follow a standard can lose marketshare. Conversely, some vendors have chosen not to adopt perfectly logical standards, ignoring customer pleas.

Should the market decide? Many manufacturers explain they’re meeting varied marketplace needs, and the market should decide what is used.

Make more standards? Perhaps there’s room for some higher level of pragmatic standardization, so more resources can make manufacturing more efficient, rather than spend quite as much effort making quite so many flavors now available.

Not so standard Ethernet? Should not-so-standard Ethernet be more standard? The physical layer of industrial Ethernet can have rugged connectors; designs vary by manufacturer and may not interoperate. Many Ethernet protocols serve the industrial space (see ONLINE extra) and can operate over the same physical layer, but need translation to communicate. Power over Ethernet has several options.

Guideline or interoperability? I’ve watched a lot of hardworking people in the ISA88 Part 5 committee spend a lot of time trying to figure out:

  • If the standard is going to be a general framework or guideline for how software is assembled, or

  • If the standard will be specific enough to allow interoperability among compliant products, creating even higher levels of efficiency and profitability.

It seems to me interoperability could bring wider benefits to more applications more quickly than a general framework.

MHoske@cfemedia.com


ONLINE EXTRA

Editor’s note : We didn’t get this page out the door without lively discussion. A point I didn’t spell out in print was that standards also can stagnate innovation when they are not modified with technology advances and marketplace needs. Please post a comment with the "Talkback" function below.

 

Here are links to some of the standards discussions mentioned above:

 

ISA88 Part 5 Make2Pack

 

Product Research: Ethernet protocols, May 2008

 

More interoperability, less effort





No comments
The Engineers' Choice Awards highlight some of the best new control, instrumentation and automation products as chosen by...
The System Integrator Giants program lists the top 100 system integrators among companies listed in CFE Media's Global System Integrator Database.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
This eGuide illustrates solutions, applications and benefits of machine vision systems.
Learn how to increase device reliability in harsh environments and decrease unplanned system downtime.
This eGuide contains a series of articles and videos that considers theoretical and practical; immediate needs and a look into the future.
Intelligent, efficient PLC programming: Cost-saving programming languages are available now; Automation system upgrades; Help from the cloud; Improving flow control; System integration tips
Smarter machines require smarter systems; Fixing PID, part 3; Process safety; Hardware and software integration; Legalities: Integrated lean project delivery
Choosing controllers: PLCs, PACs, IPCs, DCS? What's best for your application?; Wireless trends; Design, integration; Manufacturing Day; Product Exclusive
PLCs, robots, and the quest for a single controller; how OEE is key to automation solutions.
This article collection contains several articles on improving the use of PID.
Learn how Industry 4.0 adds supply chain efficiency, optimizes pricing, improves quality, and more.

Find and connect with the most suitable service provider for your unique application. Start searching the Global System Integrator Database Now!

Special report: U.S. natural gas; LNG transport technologies evolve to meet market demand; Understanding new methane regulations; Predictive maintenance for gas pipeline compressors
Cyber security cost-efficient for industrial control systems; Extracting full value from operational data; Managing cyber security risks
Drilling for Big Data: Managing the flow of information; Big data drilldown series: Challenge and opportunity; OT to IT: Creating a circle of improvement; Industry loses best workers, again