What is the future for safety networking?

Safety networking is on the rise, especially in Asia, but not as fast as total networking on a global level.

02/10/2012


Industrial networking protocols have had an excellent year. The tail-end of the recovery from the 2009 global recession resulted in the installed base of networking nodes (including both fieldbus and Ethernet) growing by over 14% from 2010 to 2011, an extra 31 million new nodes. 

Increasingly over the past few years, the major protocol associations have been developing protocols to tackle specific problems, safety being prominent among them. It has now reached the point where almost every available protocol seems to have a safety sub-protocol or an alternative; some specialist safety companies are also releasing their own. Are these protocols being adopted as fast as they are being developed? 

For new factories, there are several advantages to installing a safety network instead of the more traditional hardwired systems:

  1. Cost – Fewer cables and fewer components like safety relays are required; with some automation networks, the same network infrastructure can be used for all automation and safety functions.
  2. Easy Maintenance – Rather than having to check and replace multiple safety-monitoring relays, many problems can be flagged electronically and logic systems can be put in place to allow continued running if the problem is not critical to safe operation.
  3. Monitoring – Most safety networks can automatically keep track of the number of times a safety function has been triggered and give active readouts of the condition of individual components and the likelihood of failure. This allows pre-emptive rather than reactive maintenance.
  4. Flexibility – With component auto-detection software on some protocols, components can be switched out with minimal programming. Networking also allows for relatively simple expansion of the facility simply by adding further branches to the backbone.

Graph showing the world market for industrial safety networking from 2010-2015 and the projections. Courtesy: IMS Research

It seems surprising, therefore, that in a recent IMS Research user survey, fewer than half of respondents had any intention of adopting a safety network within the next 3 years. This survey was carried out only in EMEA and the Americas, but I believe that this percentage would have been lower if Asia Pacific had been included. So why the lack of interest?

A large part of the problem, especially in EMEA, is that very few new factories are being built. Upgrading legacy systems can be expensive and this cost is hard to justify if current safety systems comply with the legislation and are working correctly. The staff trained to maintain and use these systems do not necessarily have experience with networking; and training or hiring simply adds to the cost. One of my peers recently described manufacturers as having an “inherent conservatism," a little harsh perhaps, but I think the fact remains that any new technology trying to enter the industrial market does have a barrier of trust to overcome before it is widely adopted. With an application as critical as safety, potential users are going to want to see proof that these networks are effective, reliable and work in real-world situations before they start replacing hardwired systems they know and trust.

In much of Asia, it is a different story. While a large proportion of the global greenfield sites are in this region, industrial safety is not treated with as high a priority in many countries. While this is slowly changing with the adoption of safety legislation by China and India (amongst others) these guidelines are not always policed effectively; without enforcement, legislation cannot be effective.

These factors go some way to explaining why a recent study from IMS Research found that hardwired systems had a much larger installed base of connections than any safety protocol and that this was expected to remain the case until at least 2015. Figure 1 shows forecasts of installed nodes. Of the safety networking protocols the three most widely adopted are CIP Safety, PROFISAFE and AS-Interface Safety At Work; they are also some of the longest established and most widely promoted by their respective protocol associations.

Profile photo of Graham Brown, an analyst for IMS Research. Courtesy: IMS ResearchOverall, safety networking is growing, although not as fast as total networking on a global level. I believe that once the barriers of trust, the perceived cost-benefit ratio, limited experience, and lightly enforced safety legislation are overcome, safety networks will ultimately become firmly rooted in factory automation. The safety networking market is still young and depends heavily on legislation; when legislation is enacted and enforced is difficult to predict. I believe that safety networks will not be generally accepted before 2017, and perhaps much later; but this opinion is open to debate.



No comments
The Engineers' Choice Awards highlight some of the best new control, instrumentation and automation products as chosen by...
Each year, a panel of Control Engineering editors and industry expert judges select the System Integrator of the Year Award winners.
Control Engineering Leaders Under 40 identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
Learn more about methods used to ensure that the integration between the safety system and the process control...
Adding industrial toughness and reliability to Ethernet eGuide
Technological advances like multiple-in-multiple-out (MIMO) transmitting and receiving
Virtualization advice: 4 ways splitting servers can help manufacturing; Efficient motion controls; Fill the brain drain; Learn from the HART Plant of the Year
Two sides to process safety: Combining human and technical factors in your program; Preparing HMI graphics for migrations; Mechatronics and safety; Engineers' Choice Awards
Detecting security breaches: Forensic invenstigations depend on knowing your networks inside and out; Wireless workers; Opening robotic control; Product exclusive: Robust encoders
The Ask Control Engineering blog covers all aspects of automation, including motors, drives, sensors, motion control, machine control, and embedded systems.
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
News and comments from Control Engineering process industries editor, Peter Welander.
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
This is a blog from the trenches – written by engineers who are implementing and upgrading control systems every day across every industry.
Anthony Baker is a fictitious aggregation of experts from Callisto Integration, providing manufacturing consulting and systems integration.
Integrator Guide

Integrator Guide

Search the online Automation Integrator Guide
 

Create New Listing

Visit the System Integrators page to view past winners of Control Engineering's System Integrator of the Year Award and learn how to enter the competition. You will also find more information on system integrators and Control System Integrators Association.

Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Control Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.