JOIN US FOR OUR FALL VIRTUAL TRAINING WEEK EVENT OCTOBER 18 - 22 - REGISTRATION IS OPEN! Save Your Spot
Info Management

Benefits of an alarm management philosophy

Giving operators on the manufacturing floor a simple and clear-cut philosophy for alarm management with a simple and clear-cut system can help reduce downtime and improve overall automation and efficiency.

By Martyn Hilbers December 19, 2020
Courtesy: Chris Vavra, CFE Media

 

Learning Objectives

  • Alarm management is acknowledged as a need, but how it is managed is not often addressed. 
  • Too many alarms on the manufacturing floor can cause confusion for operators. 
  • The need for alarm management is tied into the level of automated and manual processes on the manufacturing floor. 

Alarm acknowledgement is a widely accepted industry practice, but the reason why we apply alarm acknowledgement is a question not often asked. During a recent meeting for a project with the purpose of developing an alarm management philosophy and implementing an alarm rationalization, the question “why we need alarm acknowledgement” arose.

The essence of an alarm is to notify operators about a process is going or is out of bounds and requires intervention because the automation system is incapable to change the situation. Alarm acknowledgement is used to help the operator manage the active alarms. It allows the operator to distinguish which alarms have been addressed and which have not, providing the operator with a to-do list.

From an alarm acknowledgement standpoint, this leads to an assumption it has been accepted the control system can generate multiple concurrent alarms that affect the process. It is also acceptable that the automation is not capable to deal with many situations and/or the automation is generating too many alarms.

Fewer alarms are more effective

Can we avoid too many alarms? Consider the following: a valve limit switch has malfunctioned and on opening the valve provides a failed to open alarm. The valve is part of an equipment module and this too needs to provide an alarm of this event. The equipment module is part of a phase and the phase might be part of an operation and part of a procedure.

In order to put the phase on hold and possibly the operation and perhaps even a procedure, an alarm condition must be propagated from the valve up through the hierarchy. It is important to provide the operator with a notification that explains the reason of the hold of the phase (and possibly the operation and procedure), but it is important the operator is not overwhelmed with alarms.

Alarm rationalization, efficiencies

This requires identifying possible situations involving multiple pieces of equipment and implementing alarm masking schemes for these situation to give the operator one message conveying the reason of the hold. For large processes, this is where an alarm management philosophy and the implementation of an alarm rationalization becomes important.

It will require an ongoing effort to keep the alarm rationalization and alarm-masking schemes up to date in order to provide the operator with effective alarms, however for many organizations this often falls by the wayside. The effects of neglecting alarm management are not immediately noticeable nor impactful. However the effects compound over time and lead to significant production inefficiencies.

Circling back to why we need alarm acknowledgement, the answer to that question says something about the alarm efficiency and the level of automated operation vs. manual operation of the automation.

Raising the bar on alarm acknowledgement

When sitting down to discuss and design a new automation system, should the question “do we need alarm acknowledgement” be in the top 10 of our requirement list when selecting and/or developing an automation system?

If this question is on top of the list and answered “No,” the implication is the system is expected to perform at a higher automated level, is applying alarm rationalization and requires less operator interaction.

Martyn Hilbers, principal engineer, PLC-Easy. Edited by Chris Vavra, associate editor, Control Engineering, CFE Media and Technology, cvavra@cfemedia.com.

MORE INSIGHTS 

KEYWORDS: Alarm management, alarm acknowledgement

CONSIDER THIS 

What challenges does your company face when dealing with alarms and how can they be overcome?


Martyn Hilbers
Author Bio: Martyn Hilbers, PLC-Easy