Do you have all the project team members you need?

Critical members of a project team may not always show up on an organization's chart.

10/22/2014


Steve Elwart has spent 40 years in the oil Industry, covering the areas of exploration & production and refining.In any new automation project, the technical issues underpinning it can be daunting. However, the people issues can be seen as insurmountable.

Many people have a high resistance to change. They may have the same response as they would have toward the loss of a loved one.

Four stages of mourning change are:

Denial — For some, the first reaction to a new automation project is denial. When told about a new control scheme or a new instrument technology (installing Foundation Fieldbus, for example) some people in the control room or instrument shop may say, "They'll never do that. They'll see it isn't practical." Others may say, "I'm not going to get all worked up about that. We've had projects like that before and they never worked, and we'll have them again." At the extreme, there are those who will say, "I'm not learning anything new at this stage in life; I'm retiring." (It happens more than you may think.)

Anger — As denial begins to dissipate, it may be replaced with anger. People may say, "They never asked me about that!" or "Why should I help them sort this mess out?" This anger may be coming from fear of the unknown. People may not have been given the particulars of the project and don't realize what the organization is trying to accomplish.

There is a saying, "What you don't tell us in fact, we'll fill in with rumor." Sometimes the rumor is "They're going to replace me." Other times, it's "Yeah, we put something on the computer, and all it will do is make it harder." (Sometimes, unfortunately, it does.)

Workers may blame the project team for causing them extra work and aggravation.

These workers may have a point. They may not have been asked. How many times has an automation project been put in place without actually asking those who it will affect? It could be that there really wasn't a problem to begin with. Control engineers can become so enamored with a technology that they just have to install it, whether it's needed or not.

Bargaining — Those affected by the new project may try to bargain with the project team. Bargaining is a tool people use to try to regain control. They may ask that only part of the project be done now and the other part "later." This is called "Death by a thousand (project) cuts." Rather than the feared "scope creep," resorting to "scope shrink" may actually be worse. Cutting back the project scope due to resistance or cost may cause to the entire project to turn out badly or even die.

Remember the adage, "We'll do things the cheapest way possible ... no matter how much it costs." Sometimes agreeing to a cheaper alternative may not be better.

Acceptance — Not everyone ends up accepting the new way of doing things. They will continue to grouse about the way things used to be and keep asking (loudly), "Why can't we just go back to the way things were?"

Others will finally accept the change. They may see that it was a good thing and end up embracing the change that was made.

At one plant, an advanced process control scheme was implemented on a distillation tower. The process engineers decided this control was needed and decided to incorporate it during the next turnaround. Unfortunately, the operators were told of the change only in passing and later assured that they would receive training on the new control system, "at the appropriate time."

At first, when they were showed the control narrative, they swore it would not work. After a while, the console operators found that that it did work and it gained acceptance.

A solution in search of a problem

In any project, it is important to work quickly through these "stages of grief" and move the group to accepting the change.

What follows is a method that may not work for everyone, but it has found acceptance in many plants.

The first thing to do is to make sure that the project team is not "pushing on a rope." Many times a project turns out to be a "solution in search of a problem." It is applying a fix to something that didn't need fixing.

For example, doing hydrogen balancing in a refinery hydrogen plant can contribute significantly to a plant's bottom line by shifting hydrogen production from less efficient hydrogen generation units to more efficient ones. One control engineer wanted to put that plant's hydrogen plants on load balancing until informed by the operations manager the plant was not going to do it.

The manager explained that while it is a great idea in concept, all three hydrogen plants were running at maximum capacity, and when the load on each unit is 100%, load balancing is not necessary.

In this case, the "fix" wasn't needed.

In another case, the IT staff decided to install a document control system in the plant. However, there was no pent-up demand for it within the refinery. The document control system was put in place. Then the departments were told the system was online and were asked what they wanted on the system. The answer was, "I don't know, let me think about it."

The IT department struggled for a long time with the system before there was enough demand to actually use it.

One good rule of automation projects is to generate a demand for the project and let another group, such as operations, ask for it. At that point, it is no longer a controls project; it is an operations project with a lot more momentum behind it to get it done.

That is called "planting seeds." As one salesman who had been in the business for years said, "My job is not to sell you something; my job is to make you want to buy it."

If you are promoting a project, don't try to sell someone on the "gee whiz" technology of a project. Show that person a need (preferably one he or she has expressed before) and show how this project can fulfill that need. For example, don't try to sell a person the terminal on a terminal management system; instead, show a way he or she can prevent tank overflows and product contamination due to misaligned valve setups.

See next page for more about project team, champion, manager, prophet, and cheerleader


<< First < Previous 1 2 Next > Last >>

No comments
The Engineers' Choice Awards highlight some of the best new control, instrumentation and automation products as chosen by...
The System Integrator Giants program lists the top 100 system integrators among companies listed in CFE Media's Global System Integrator Database.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
This eGuide illustrates solutions, applications and benefits of machine vision systems.
Learn how to increase device reliability in harsh environments and decrease unplanned system downtime.
This eGuide contains a series of articles and videos that considers theoretical and practical; immediate needs and a look into the future.
Sensor-to-cloud interoperability; PID and digital control efficiency; Alarm management system design; Automotive industry advances
Make Big Data and Industrial Internet of Things work for you, 2017 Engineers' Choice Finalists, Avoid control design pitfalls, Managing IIoT processes
Engineering Leaders Under 40; System integration improving packaging operation; Process sensing; PID velocity; Cybersecurity and functional safety
This article collection contains several articles on the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) and how it is transforming manufacturing.

Find and connect with the most suitable service provider for your unique application. Start searching the Global System Integrator Database Now!

SCADA at the junction, Managing risk through maintenance, Moving at the speed of data
Flexible offshore fire protection; Big Data's impact on operations; Bridging the skills gap; Identifying security risks
The digital oilfield: Utilizing Big Data can yield big savings; Virtualization a real solution; Tracking SIS performance
click me