Machine safety equipment lowers risk to operators, maintenance workers or other humans and helps keep a hazardous process or operation (human or automated) from causing harm to itself, individuals, other processes, the plant, environment or other surroundings. Many industry and government organizations set codes, standards, recommendations and best practices for machine safety, many of them requiring or suggesting documentation to ensure compliance and or training for equipment manufacturers, system integrators and or users. Safety equipment can be passive (such as a gate or barrier); in hardware or software design (such as slowing or stopping a robot if a human nears); or active (such as a light curtain or area sensor or safety pressure mat that halts a process when triggered).
Machine Safety Articles
Implementing a hierarchy of automation safety
A layered approach for addressing industrial automation safety provides optimal results.
- Safety comes in many forms and is a critical aspect of manufacturing operations. It starts with fundamentals like awareness and having the right equipment on-hand. While a good starting point, it is really the first step in the journey and can go in much greater detail.
- A hierarchy of controls is a good way to build a safety program in effectiveness and making a culture that emphasizes worker safety and wellness.
- There are many safety solutions ranging from personal protective equipment (PPE) to alarms and sensors. Many advanced tools can be managed on a tablet or smartphone and users can tailor them to fit the company’s specific needs.
The considerations surrounding design and implementation of industrial automation safety are extensive, with specialized training required to fully address each potential issue. In fact, before planning for any safety-related systems, it is important certified experts perform a safety audit to assess the conditions and determine the proper design path. In part this is because safety standards and regulations evolve over time, so the concept “we’ve always done it this way” doesn’t hold up.
On the other hand, good industrial automation safety design almost always involves a multi-layered approach combining the right products, design practices, and operational training. The first step in achieving a safe workplace is to perform a risk assessment to identify potential issues, and the goal then changes to lowering risks through mitigation. A hierarchy approach of engineering and administrative controls is used to guide the most effective methods for protecting workers.
All personnel on the project and operation teams benefit from an understanding of the relevant safety concepts, even if their core task isn’t creating the actual detailed design of safety systems. It’s important to understand the most common topics involved with safety design, providing overview information required to inform staff.
Hierarchy of controls
Two of the most prominent safety organizations in North America are Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). OSHA creates and enforces regulations, while NIOSH is involved with research and investigation. In addition, there are many other regulatory agencies, codes, and standards associated with industrial safety.
For any equipment using industrial automation, the design of the automation systems certainly plays a role with regards to safety. However, safe design that protects workers is a much larger concept extending to the physical properties and usage of any equipment under consideration.
A traditional approach for personnel executing safe design is to consider several layers in a hierarchy of controls to provide a complete safety solution (Figure 1).
Figure 1: A hierarchy of controls approach to safe design prompts the consideration of the most effective methods first. Courtesy: AutomationDirect
The term “hierarchy of controls” does not refer to real-time controls, but instead defines what steps users should take to control and limit the hazards presented by any equipment or installation. There are often many potential steps which can be applied, in conjunction with each other to some extent. There are five layers involved in this process.
1. Elimination of the hazard to reduce risk
The best and most effective risk mitigation step is elimination, which means removing or deleting the potential hazard. Unfortunately, this is not a viable option most of the time because most machines and processes cannot be designed in a way to remove all possible hazards. However, designers should always consider elimination as an option.
For instance, a machine may have an easily opened inspection hatch, exposing users to potentially hazardous access. The hatch could be replaced by non-movable sheet metal, but that would be a problem for maintenance teams. Perhaps installing an interlocking safety switch and making the hatch openable only with tools is a better approach.
2. Substitution of the hazard to decrease risk
Even if a hazard can’t be eliminated, it may be possible to perform a substitution, replacing the hazard with something less severe or requiring less frequent access. Sometimes this isn’t possible. For example, when it comes to equipment using chemicals, perhaps a safer chemical — from the standpoint of flammability or toxicity — could be available. Even if the safer chemical costs more, it would often be worth it to realize benefits, such as more efficient work practices and fewer potential incidents.
Figure 2: This warehousing installation shows physical fencing to guard users from the moving equipment, and an e-stop button (lower left) so users can rapidly force all equipment to a safe state. Courtesy: AutomationDirect
Continuing with the previous access hatch example, maybe a shatter-resistant fixed window could be installed instead of a hatch so that users could inspect the equipment without being exposed to the mechanism.
3. Engineering controls to reduce risk
While it is always important to investigate the first two steps, the reality is that for modern automated equipment the next step of applying engineering controls is often where most risk mitigation will be accomplished. Engineering controls can be simple or complex, and they may take many forms.
- Physical: Adding gates, guards, walls, cages, and bollards are a simple yet important way to safeguard users (Figure 2).
- Sensors: Many types of sensors can detect dangerous conditions or that may be triggered by users to indicate and mitigate a hazard. These include emergency stop (e-stop) buttons, e-stop pullcords, light curtains, limit switches, and others. Any one of multiple sensors wired or programmed in series may be used to initiate an e-stop (Figure 3).
- Interlocks: Some safety sensors are interlocking, which means they can be locked closed to prevent users from opening the associated equipment unless it is safe to do so.
- Removing energy: Sensors and interlocks can be wired via safety relays or safety controllers, to disconnect energy to motors, actuators, and any other devices which could otherwise harm users. Energy can take several forms: electrical mains power, electrical device power and most often missed is pneumatic energy and even hydraulic energy. Sensors may be wired to remove energy, or they may be designed as part of more capable hardwired relay or digital safety controller circuits. Safety controllers are advanced digital devices, are very configurable via software and can communicate with higher-level systems.
- Stop kinetic motion: Certain physical systems require additional attention to prevent motion even after energy is removed in the event of an e-stop. Pneumatic circuits may need a quick-dump valve to remove pressure from cylinders that might otherwise move. Equipment like vertical presses or shears may need mechanical stoppers to prevent movement due to gravity after an e-stop. Motor-driven mechanicals may call for brakes to stop rotational motion after an e-stop.
- Software: When all preceding methods have been applied, another good enhancement for programmable systems is to add permissive programming which checks sensors and system parameters as appropriate, and then prevents users from enabling and e-stop circuit until all conditions are safe.
- Wiring: For the preceding methods involving safety sensors, interlocks, relays and controllers, these devices have specialized designs with dual-electrical contacts and other failsafe provisions. Standard non-safety devices often are not acceptable.
For the access hatch example, engineering controls could include installing an interlock switch, which only allows the inspection door to open if the machine is safe and prevents the machine from running if the door is open.
Figure 3: Although some other methods are preferable, there is still a need for administrative controls, like clear warning lights and labels. Courtesy: AutomationDirect
4. Administrative controls to lower risk
After the preceding steps have been incorporated, it is important to address the human element. This includes any design, engineering, maintenance, contractor, visitor or other personnel who will work with the equipment, or could potentially be in the area.
A training program is important for making users aware of safety concerns, work practices and proper procedures. Rigorous lockout/tagout (LOTO) procedures are essential for protecting workers who need direct access to equipment. In addition, clear warning labels, signage, and indicator lights provide an additional layer of protection.
5. Personal protective equipment (PPE) to decrease risk
In most industrial settings, PPE such as safety glasses, earplugs, respirators, safety toe boots, gloves, and the like are standard. Some situations call for more complex fall protection systems, along with associated training. Even though these items are indispensable for worker protection, they are at the bottom of the hierarchy of controls and should not be viewed as mitigating identified risks as they are a method of last resort. They also require ongoing worker effort to use PPE.
Mitigate, but validate
After a safety design has been created, the results must be validated in conformance with ISO 13849-2 to ensure that the target hazards identified in the risk assessment are truly mitigated. Sometimes the process can be a bit iterative, requiring some repeated steps.
For instance, mitigation efforts in the elimination and substitution steps, tend to also create new risks. After a validation is completed, a new risk assessment needs to be performed. It is not enough to use the risk assessment as a check list.
Also, some standards in the US state a risk assessment needs to be performed periodically (ANSI/RIA R15.06). This prompts the end user to reevaluate industrial equipment to see if any changes to the area have created new hazards. Also, each year new products and ideas can provide improved safety.
A spectrum of safety solutions
Creating safe industrial equipment, systems, and automation is never a one-time task. Instead, it is an ongoing life cycle. In addition, safety is not only the responsibility of one environmental health and safety (EHS) officer. All team members have a stake in safe designs and operation. Each task from risk assessment to mitigation to validation should be completed by a team. Another recommendation is introducing a degree of checks and balances, such as having different personnel perform the safety engineering and the validation. This provides more awareness to the team and allows things to be viewed from a different perspective.
Many engineering considerations and products are required for creating safe industrial designs. To assist in these projects, team members in all company roles can access industrial automation supplier websites to see a wide range of products that can be implemented for providing layers of safety.
Machine Safety FAQ
What is required for machine safety?
Machine safety involves the design, implementation and maintenance of systems and processes to protect workers from potential hazards associated with the operation of machinery. This includes the use of safety devices, guards, warning labels and emergency stop buttons, as well as proper training for workers on how to safely operate and maintain the machinery. Regular inspections and maintenance of the machinery are important to ensure it is in proper working condition and to identify and address any potential hazards.
What are the 5 types of machine safeguards?
- Mechanical guards: These are physical barriers that physically block access to machinery's moving parts, such as gears, belts and pulleys.
- Interlocking devices: These are mechanisms that stop or lock the machine when a guard or cover is opened or removed.
- Emergency stop buttons: These are devices that allow workers to quickly and easily shut down the machinery in case of an emergency.
- Warning labels and signs: These are visual cues that alert workers to potential hazards and help instruct them on how to safely operate the machinery.
- Safety devices: These are additional devices that are designed to protect workers from specific hazards, such as light curtains, two-hand controls and pressure-sensitive body bars.
What are machine safety hazards?
Machine safety hazards are potential dangers posed by machinery and equipment to workers who operate or work near them. These hazards can result in serious injury or death and can be caused by a variety of factors, including:
- Mechanical hazards: These include moving parts that can crush, cut or amputate body parts, as well as sharp edges, hot surfaces and high pressure fluids.
- Electrical hazards: These include shock, electrocution and burns from electrical equipment and wiring.
- Fire hazards: These include explosions, sparks and electrical arcing that can ignite flammable materials or burn.
- Chemical hazards: These include toxic fumes, liquids and dusts that can cause respiratory problems, chemical burns and other health issues.
- Ergonomic hazards: These include repetitive motions, awkward postures and excessive force that can lead to musculoskeletal disorders and other types of injury.
- Radiation hazards: These include ultraviolet, infrared and other types of radiation that can cause skin damage and other health issues.
What are the standard machine safety requirements for manufacturers?
There are several international and national standards for machine safety that manufacturers must comply with to ensure the safety of products and the workers who use them. U.S. machine safety standards include (not all inclusive):
- ISO 12100:2010: This international standard provides a systematic approach to identifying and assessing the hazards associated with machinery, and provides guidelines for the design and construction of safe machinery.
- ANSI B11 series: This American National Standard Institute (ANSI) series provides safety requirements for various types of machinery, including metalworking, woodworking, and material handling equipment.
- OSHA 1910 Subpart O: This U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standard provides requirements for the use and maintenance of machinery and equipment in the workplace, and includes specific requirements for guards, emergency stops, and lockout/tagout procedures.
- ISO 10218, Parts 1 and 2, by the ISO Technical Committee (TC) 299, Robotics (nationally adopted in the U.S. as R15.06), which includes Parts 1 and 2 in the same document.
It is important for manufacturers to comply with these and other safety standards as appropriate to lower risk for workers and help to protect the manufacturer from liability. Compliance also can help to improve the reliability and performance of machinery and equipment.
Some FAQ content was compiled with the assistance of ChatGPT. Due to the limitations of AI tools, all content was edited and reviewed by our content team.