Not Your Grandfather’s Conveyor Line!
Robots, automatic guided vehicles, smart conveyors...How’s a body to know what motion technology to use where?
C.G. Masi, Control Engineering -- Control Engineering, 11/1/2007
As I sit, staring out of this airport window at a baggage handler unloading the belly of a not-so-jumbo jet, I’m struck by how woefully behind the times that baggage handling system really is. We have a human manually picking packages off a mobile conveyor belt that he earlier towed up to the jet with a little riding tractor. He also towed along two or three double decker baggage trailers, like a little toy train from Disneyland. This equipment, developed during the 1950s, is motion technology with which your grandfather would have been familiar.
I compare this with technology I saw at Siemens’ airport technology development facility in Nuremberg, Germany, last year, and similar systems I’ve seen demonstrated at half a dozen places since. Material handling technology already in use in many facilities around the U.S. and around the world makes this stuff I’ve been watching bring to mind the comment by Mr. Spock in an early Star Trek episode about “stone knives and bear skins.”
The word “mechatronic” is smashing its way into material handling technology. The material-handling-systems that vendors now are developing are fast, powerful and, above all, highly automated. They come in all sizes and shapes, run on wheels, tracks, rollers, and even magnetic fields. No matter what the task, you can probably find something that will do it faster, safer, more reliably, and less expensively than anything guided by a human hand.
These technologies fall into three broad categories: robots, automatically guided vehicles (AGVs), and smart conveyors. Most material handling applications are hybrid systems whose designers deploy just the right technology to do the job at just the right place. The trick, therefore, is matching the technology to the job.
(Please scroll down for table and more article.)
| Technology |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
| Robots |
| Articulated arm |
* Highly adaptable * Can manipulate work * Coordination possible * Multiaxis * Reconfigurable |
* Fixed mounting * Slow * Limited weight capacity * Low throughput * No mobility |
| Delta |
* Multiaxis * Very fast * Reconfigurable |
* Limited weight capacity * No mobility * Limited throughput |
| Free-form |
* Highly adaptable * Multiaxis * Fast * Unlimited capacity |
* Complex * Hard to reconfigure * Low throughput * No mobility |
| Automatically Guided Vehicles |
| Fork-truck |
* Highly mobile * Fast * Long distance * Large capacity * Unlimited paths |
* Potential safety hazard * Expensive |
| Cart |
* Highly mobile * Very large capacity * Provides work surface * Long distance * Unlimited paths |
* Provides no grippers * Expensive * Must stay with load * Limited adaptability |
| Tractor |
* Unlimited capacity * Highly mobile * Inexpensive trailers * Unlimited paths * Long distances |
* Provides no grippers * Limited adaptability |
| Smart conveyor |
| All |
* Very fast * High throughput |
* Hard to reconfigure * Provides no grippers * Limited weight capacity * Limited fixed paths * Limited distance |