I/O Strategies Live Distributed or Die
Adapting New Hampshire's motto, "Live Free or Die," controls designers must change to a distributed architecture to reduce cost and increase future flexibility or see their company lose its competitive advantage—"Live Distributed or Die." Distributing I/O modules closer to the action connected to the controller with one network quick-connect cable reduces total wiring costs, increas...
Adapting New Hampshire’s motto, “Live Free or Die,” controls designers must change to a distributed architecture to reduce cost and increase future flexibility or see their company lose its competitive advantage—”Live Distributed or Die.” Distributing I/O modules closer to the action connected to the controller with one network quick-connect cable reduces total wiring costs, increases flexibility for future changes, enables OEMs to standardize, and reduces chance of wiring errors.
Charlie Cook, Wago (Germantown, Wis.) electronics product manager, puts it this way, “If an OEM is not proactively asking how to use networked I/O, the company will lose the marketing war. An engineer today must be open-minded toward the changes taking place and work with experienced vendors to shorten the learning curve.”
Anyone who has visited a manufacturing plant is familiar with the current state of controls. Most noticeable when entering a manufacturing area is a wall of enclosures. Inside the enclosures will be power supply equipment, a PLC rack with controller and I/O modules, more remote I/O racks, banks of relays and motor starters, and lots of wiring duct and wire. The wire terminates in rows of terminal blocks, one wire per input and output. Wires attached to the other side of the terminal blocks meander along the machine or production line to various devices.
In a distributed system, there is still need for a power supply and a controller. The controller may still look like, or even be, a PLC. It may also be a computer in one of many disguises. The only other thing required at this point is a communications card.
Blocks of I/O are now independent of any PLC or custom rack. Most are DIN-rail mountable. Initially designed in blocks of analog, digital, or mixed signals, distributed I/O modules are increasingly granular. This gives the designer a way to place just as many I/O modules at the site as needed and add just what is necessary in future changes. Each distributed I/O block has a communications adaptor. The designer chooses the network optimum for the application, then matches communications adaptors for the system for that protocol.
Wiring now consists of one cable from the controller with drops (depending on the topology of the network) to each I/O location. Electricians now only run wires a short distance from the I/O module to the sensor, actuator, etc.
Derald Herinckx, GE Fanuc Automation (Charlottesville, Va.) remote I/O product manager, says, “When we conducted market research during development of the Versamax line, end-users told us they wanted to standardize on one communications layer so that it was easier to hook machines together. Meanwhile OEMs wanted to standardize on hardware as much as possible to cut costs. The answer is to develop an I/O system that can hook into any standard communications network.”
Optimize control structure
Adds Laurie Davis, I/O product manager at GE Fanuc, “What both OEMs and end-users are trying to do is optimize control structure to each application.” She suggests that engineers beginning this process analyze the physical layout of the equipment to determine the best component location, calculate required system response times, look at specific I/O needs like high analog or high-speed counters, then determine what network and I/O products support this.
Should anyone be surprised by the discussion of networks while talking about I/O devices?
As Siemens Energy & Automation (Alpharetta, Ga.) networks and I/O product specialist John Burns puts it, “You can’t talk about I/O products anymore without talking about buses. Where once you talked about technology of the device, now you also look at the benefit of the wire. Since you can put the I/O device where it best serves its purpose, you don’t have to build the machine around the control. You build the best machine for the application, then put the control where it works best.”
This looks like more work for the engineer, and it is. The gain is freedom to design more functions in and more cost out of the equipment. Is this just a marketing dream of those seeking greater market share? No. It looks like many customer engineers are seriously weighing their options at design and specification time. Siemens’ Mr. Burns continues, “We are seeing mo re head-to-head performance testing before deciding on the specification. We emphasize to engineers to look at real-world performance and to look beyond mere ‘specmanship.'”
Graham Harris, I/O business manager at Rockwell Automation (Mayfield Heights, O.), sees increasing demand for openness and network compatibility from customers. He points to four trends:
Collapsing architectures —I/O functions will be integrated with another object like a controller or device;
Intelligent I/O devices create better information integration and commercially available technology;
Distributed architectures permit shorter wiring runs with increased use of networks; and
Reduced space —control panels will continue to shrink as more control equipment moves closer to the machine, and increased use of hardened I/O modules that don’t require an enclosure.
Ideal I/O system
Mike Rothwell, Advantech Automation (Cincinnati, O.) product manager, ventures a description of today’s ideal I/O system. It is completely distributed with electronics and network interface integrated with the field device. This added intelligence would be cost-effective, not commanding a large premium price over its predecessor. Its high speed will enable control over the network. Intelligent devices handle local control of events without remote intervention. Finally, the system would be self-diagnosing, performing duties like reporting failures and requesting maintenance.
Danny Lease, Weidmuller (Richmond, Va.) technical support specialist for I/O products, acknowledges the strides diagnostics has taken with fieldbus connected I/O devices. “Testing out all the connections in those huge cabinets of control and I/O modules took a long time for a technician. Now the problem is located faster and more easily. Such common problems as short or open circuit are pinpointed saving much maintenance time.”
Maria Piazza, senior marketing manager and former product manager, notes that Weidmuller looks at its business as connectivity. Open architectures have enabled it to move beyond terminal blocks and connectors. I/O modules are just another way of connecting field devices to the controller. The real benefit of this consolidation of functions is cost reduction—not just material, but also the labor cost of additional wiring and checking.
Bryan Moore, Entrelec (Irving, Tex.) product support engineer, lists savings obtained from new I/O strategies as cost and time savings. An OEM can standardize on one I/O device vendor, see inventories decrease, and have the ability to negotiate better prices with increased volume from the single source. A simple bus coupler change from one system to the next yields compatibility with customers’ processes. Application software need not be changed from system to system, and standard configuration software for the low number of standard networks save programming time.
An OEM using a VME or CompactPCI controller lands a new customer using a different network. No problem, according to Mark Knebusch, industry and systems group manager for Phoenix Contact (Harrisburg, Pa.). Not only can OEMs realize benefits of machine optimization, but off-the-shelf network adaptors are available for these and other controller form factors.
Says Omron Electronics I/O specialist, Bill Arnold, “The most dramatic way customer acceptance of open I/O architecture has changed machine design is in final testing and shipping. Previously, an OEM would manufacture, assemble, test, disconnect, break down, and ship the machine, only to reassemble, test, and debug on the customer’s floor. With distributed I/O architecture, each cell can be tested independently. Cells are connected with network cabling on the customer’s floor and final system debugging is all that is left. This can save weeks, or even months.”
Joe Benedetto, I/O business development operations manager for Schneider Electric’s Automation Business (North Andover, Mass.), notes another benefit, both for OEMs and end-users—easy expansion of the system in the future. It is inevitable that changes will be made after the machine or process has been in production. Distributed I/O racks are now designed to allow easy insertion of additional modules. Most networks easily recognize the new point making it less painful to change.
As Greg Matthews, Wieland Inc. (Burgaw, N.C.) product manager says, “As far as I/O modules themselves are concerned, the major activity of companies is filling out a complete line of types. The challenge is to stay up with customer demand for the type of network desired. One other thing to watch is whether fiber-optic cabling catches on.”
A note of caution comes from John Browett, product marketing manager of Mitsubishi Electric Automation (Vernon Hills, Ill.). “In our experience, most companies do not wish to fully exploit this flexibility due to the difficulties involved with working and negotiating with multiple vendors. Many companies want an open solution but wind up with a ‘semi-open’ one, because most purchases came from one vendor.”
There will always be uses for PLCs with either plug-in I/O modules or built-in I/O points. Distributed I/O would not normally be useful in machines with a small footprint. Connect that machine to many others on a production line, however, and distributed I/O devices networked to each other and a controller makes great technical and economic sense.
Ethernet for I/O level communication
The number of proponents for adopting Ethernet as a standard fieldbus seems to be growing. While many engineers dismiss Ethernet as not robust enough for industrial use, many others are successfully using it. Usage is not limited to controller to plant data systems, but also for controller to I/O devices. Companies actively marketing Ethernet I/O devices all report high user acceptance. In fact, a new company, Optimation (Huntsville, Ala.), has just entered the fray with very cost competitive Ethernet I/O products.
There is even an Industrial Ethernet Association (
National Instruments’ (Austin, Tex.) director of engineering, Perry Steger, states, “Keep a close eye on Ethernet. The cost of ASICs is inexpensive, and 100 Mb technology is becoming ubiquitous. No other bus can match the technology development level of Ethernet companies like Cisco and Intel. In a well-designed Ethernet system, collisions just won’t happen. The determinism issue will fade away as use grows. Our only challenge with Ethernet I/O is keeping up with demand.”
Opto 22 (Temecula, Calif.) has standard TCP/IP over Ethernet. As director of technical marketing, Benson Hougland, says, “Since this is the backbone of the Internet, it becomes intuitive to use Web technologies for configuring and troubleshooting Ethernet I/O systems.”
Robert Oglesby, president of Host Engineering (Johnson City, Tenn.), a member of the Automationdirect.com (Cummings, Ga.) federation, says, “We have had Ethernet I/O modules for two years now, and the technology has been very stable with no serious issues. We expected 10baseT to have noise or other problems in some applications, but have had no complaints. If customers felt they needed immunity or distance, they automatically went to the commercial market for the necessary equipment.”
Do open technologies add more responsibility to the user? Mr. Oglesby replies, “Yes, there cannot be freedom without responsibility. You can go for lower prices in the open market and shoulder the responsibility to put them together, or pay more for integrated solutions. Of course, there is a place for both options.”
Don’t be surprised to see more Ethernet I/O products coming soon.
Train meets Bus at Post Office
More often then not, domestic and international mail transfers through a U.S. Postal Service regional distribution center like the one in Seattle, Wa. The Tray Management System (TMS) used here is the first project in the U.S. for Siemens Electrocom LP (Arlington, Tex.).
The mail train
The most visible aspect of the TMS operation is a series of trains rolling along tracks above sorting machines and postal workers. The train is an integral piece of this entire TMS system, as well as a showcase for sensor-level bus technology. Siemens ElectroCom’s Automation Systems group (Novi, Mich.) designed, assembled, and installed the system. Siemens Energy & Automation (Alpharetta, Ga.) manufactures most of the control and communications equipment used.
Variable frequency drives control train engine (tug) speeds. An on-board SimaticS7-315 programmable logic controller (PLC) provides control. The tug pulls a trolley of up to 31 relay-operated dumping trays containing mail-sorting totes filled with letters and parcels. A bar code label inserted in a plastic sleeve on the end of the tote identifies the contents. A radio frequency identification module identifies each tug. The PLC regulates speed through the drive, monitors its position on the rail system, and communicates with host computers by radio.
HMI panels, located at every sorting segment, give plant personnel a real-time view of the entire plant-wide system. Local monitors can be toggled to plant-wide view but are mainly used to identify mail volumes for a specific area of operation and to schedule mail-processing equipment. The central monitoring station manages system-wide diagnostics and error-correction. Operators receive instant information about the nature of any problem and its exact location.
Follow the yellow brick road
No, it’s not Oz, but the distinctive yellow bus cable identifying Actuator Sensor Interface, or AS-i, installed over the length of overhead train tracks and powered roller conveyors of the scanning and sorting segments. All segments have an AS-i master. AS-i connects each segment’s field devices (sensors and actuators) to the PLCs. The AS-i master communicates with up to 31 slaves. Slaves are the input and output channels of the AS-i system. The master can interrogate all the slaves in a maximum time of 5 msec.
AS-i slaves are the modules that directly interface with the field devices. Each slave is accessed via its address (1 to 31) and can transfer 4 data bits. This means a single AS-i master/slave system can have up to 124 binary subscribers.
Each tug pulls up to 30 relay-operated dumping trays. These “trolley” components each have a specially designed AS-i slave module. These modules identify the trolley and initiate dumping. The addresses for each of these slaves are only assigned after the PLC has powered up. Once powered, the PLC only addresses the AS-i module of the first trolley. This trolley’s AS-i module activates the second trolley via an enable line automatically assigning an address. This process is repeated for each successive trolley. The flexibility of configuration met one of the important design goals of the system.
In addition to eliminating a multitude of hand operations, three requirements were met with the new mail distribution center: short turnaround times, flexibility, and capacity.